Animal Experimentation

659 Words2 Pages

Because of animal experimentation, scientists are able to advance in medicine and find cures and treatments, but all this must pay a prize. Animals in these experiments suffer and even die for the cause. Many argue that it is inhumane and cruel. Others would argue that animal experimentation is beneficial and necessary. The viewpoints between Jane Goodall and Dario Ringach are different when it comes to animal testing, but they’re after the same goal: caring for the animals and wanting to look for cures and treatments. Dr. Jane Goodall, a primatologist and ethologist, believes that animal testing is "morally, and ethically unacceptable". In her article, "So Much Animal Pain, So Little Human Gain", she states that animal testing does not benefit for humans and how much the animal suffer in the experiment. Using animal in research can't always predict the results for humans. There are some cases that even though the experiment succeeded, it wasn't safe for humans. Around 92% of drugs that passed in the animal testing didn't work with humans (Top 5 Reason). The reason is that animals are different from humans. Even though animals can't talk or make judgments like humans, they have emotions, consciousness, and intelligence. The animals can feel stress, fear, and pain during the experiment. She claims that there are alternatives other than animals like using cells, computer models, and more. She also includes that animal testing cost a lot more than the alternatives. The biggest issue when it comes to animal testing is how animals are treated during the experiment. Although animals are protected from the Animal Welfare Act, not all animals that are used for research are not protected. With that, there are chances that they can be ... ... middle of paper ... ...red and tested. There can be a compromise if the Animal Welfare Act protects all the species used for research, reduce and eliminate pain, and looking for better alternatives. Maybe in the near future, the alternatives will replace animals and then they won't be needed for research Works Cited "About FDA." Why Are Animals Used for Testing Medical Products? N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Mar. 2014. Goodall, Jane. "So Much Animal Pain, so Little Human Gain." The Times [London] 17 Mar. 2012, Opinions sec.: n. pag. 17 Mar. 2012. Web. ProCon.org. "Animal Testing" ProCon.org. 18 Mar. 2011. Web. 12 Mar. 2014. Ringach, Dario L. "The Use of Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Research." The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 342.4 (2011): 305-13. Print "Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing." PETA Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing Comments. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Mar. 2014

Summary Of A Question Of Ethics By Jane Goodall
677 Words | 2 Pages
When Goodall asserts that scientists shouldn’t mindlessly test animals if alternative tests are available, she is in effect conceding that sometimes animals will have to suffer for the sake of helping human beings. Yet if it is unacceptable in some cases to cause sentient beings to suffer, why would it not always be unacceptable? When could compassionate people be comfortable with the prospect of causing David Greybeard mental and p...
Read More
Let's Put an End to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation
2009 Words | 5 Pages
Lane, Stuart. “Banning Animal Testing May Be Hazardous to Your Health.” Priorities Spring 2013: 23.
Read More
Animal Testing Dbq
597 Words | 2 Pages
The information that animals have provided scientists over the past decades has changed society, and is still changing society for the better. Millions of lives have been saved with the use of animal testing and many more will be saved with continued research. However, there are many who dismiss this monumental achievement completely and oppose the use of animals in laboratory research. Though many find this practice to be
Read More
Jane Goodall A Question Of Ethics Essay
1446 Words | 3 Pages
Animal experimentation has always been a highly debated topic. Many have argued for the use of animal experimentation claiming that animal experimentation is the only possible way to find medical treatments to preserve human life. However, animal rights activists have argued that animal experimentation is futile and that it is unethical to use the life of an animal for experimentation without the animal’s consent. Although both sides of the debated issue present reasonable opinions, the use of animals for experimentation is the most effective form scientists have in order to find medical breakthroughs. In Jane Goodall’s essay “A Question of Ethics,” she argues that animals should not be experimented on because there are more advanced alternatives than using animal lives. In Goodall’s defence, we should not support activities
Read More
animal experimentation
545 Words | 2 Pages
Imagine if your pet was getting experimented on for a product you might buy in the future. Would anyone really want that product, your pet was in pain because of it? Animals are getting experimented on for products to get released to the public. Some companies are using vitro researching to test their products but not enough companies are using vitro as their form of testing products. Synthetic skin could reduce the amount of animals getting tested on everyday for companies to release new products to the public. Animals are getting experimented on everyday.
Read More
The Necessities of Animal Experimentation
1270 Words | 3 Pages
...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.
Read More
Opposing Views On Animal Experimentation
1212 Words | 3 Pages
Lastly, there is refinement where researchers need to filter their animal use for their experiments. Another point of agreement is the Animal Welfare Act. The Animal Welfare Act puts restrictions on experimenting, transporting, and researching on animals. “The intent of congress in passing this act... ... middle of paper ... ...
Read More
Animal Testing: What if You Were in Their Place?
1622 Words | 4 Pages
The issue of animal testing has become an important topic of debate because despite the cruel and inhumane treatment of laboratory animals, people who support animal testing claim that the research benefits are phenomenal and surely outweigh the animals’ pain and suffering. I feel as though the question of whether or not animal testing is immoral is an easy answer. Animal testing on any species is unethical and should be abolished as soon as possible because it is a form of animal cruelty, provides inaccurate results, and there are better alternatives that can be pursued.
Read More
Experiments Carried Out on Animals
1419 Words | 3 Pages
...s Human and Animal Lives." Americans for Medical Progress. (20 March 1999). "Animal Research Holds the Key to Saving Human Lives." Americans for Medical Progress. (20 March 1999). Ball, Matt and Anne Green, and Jack Norris. "Veganism as the Path to Animal Liberation." The Animal's Agenda Sep/Oct 1998: 44-45. Botting, Jack H. and Adrian R. Morrison. "Animal Research is Vital to Medicine." Scientific American. 187 February 1997: 83-85. D. E. "Skin Stand-Ins." Scientific American. September 1990: 168. James-Enger, Kelly. "Beyond Animal Testing." Vegetarian Times. October 1998: 254. "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals." (20 March 1999). "21 Things You May Not Know About the Animal Rights Movement." Americans for Medical Progress. (20 March 1999). U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Animal Welfare Report Fiscal Year 1997.
Read More
Animal Testing: Unnecessary Pain for Dubious Gain
1607 Words | 4 Pages
“The question is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk. But can they suffer?” (Bentham). Each year over a hundred million animals endure a number of experiments in an attempt to make human lives easier. These experiments range from cosmetic testing to medical research, sadly neither of these tests are needed. Many people will accept animal research because they believe that these animals aren’t suffering (“Harm and Suffering”) or they believe that animal testing in beneficial to humans. In reality, these animals suffer for mankind, when the need does not exist. Animal testing creates unnecessary pain and suffering for animals, when in reality most experiments will not benefit human health.
Read More
Pros of Animal Experimentation
921 Words | 2 Pages
Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures. This is how animal experimentation is of use to society for humans and animals.
Read More
Animal Experimentation
822 Words | 2 Pages
For years now people have been using animal experimentation to create new ways to help save the human race. There are people who believe that it does help, and that it is necessary to continue, while others oppose and want to fight for the elimination of animal experimentation. Scientists fight for the cures needed to help man kind, but struggle to do so as people fight against their work in progress. But as Jennifer A. Hurley stated, “History has already shown that animal experimentation is not essential to medical progress.” Stuart W.G. Derbyshire believes “The best hopes to treat or cure any number of diseases all rely in the current animal experiments.” Both sides have evidence that can allow both to be proven correct. But there are negative arguments that can prove the other wise. The real question to ask is, Does animal experimentation really help advance medical research?
Read More
Animal Testing is Wrong!
938 Words | 2 Pages
Animal Rights. [online] http://www.writefix.com/argument/about.htm, May 2003 Habentinova, Lenka. Debate: Animal Testing. [online] http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:Animal_testing, May, 12 2010 Dr. Farnaud, Sebastein. Non-Animal Research.
Read More
Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical?
2169 Words | 5 Pages
Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1976. Call Number: HV4711.A56. American Medical Association. The “Animal Experimentation Benefits Human Health”. Animal Rights Opposing Viewpoints?
Read More
Arguments Against Animal Testing
1189 Words | 3 Pages
“The question is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk. But, can they suffer” ( “Harm and Suffering”). Testing on animals has been around since about 1831. It was a thing of the past, researchers and scientists were not sure if there was another way to test new medicines and cosmetics. But now scientists have found an alternative. Animals are usually tested for new vaccines, medicine, cosmetics and more. Animals feel both physical and mental pain, they are also harmed and often killed after the experiment or due to the experiment. They often suffer from food and water deprivation, and forced chemical exposure. Most of which are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). Therefore, animal testing is wrong and inhumane, and should be banned from further experiments.
Read More

Open Document

Wait a second!

Animal Experimentation

Summary Of A Question Of Ethics By Jane Goodall

Let's Put an End to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

Animal Testing Dbq

Jane Goodall A Question Of Ethics Essay