Transition of Buddha's Depiction in Early Indian Art

2779 Words6 Pages

End Term Paper Name: Ajanta Das, Rgst. No.: 10832 Batch: MA Semester II Subject: SAA 401; The History of Indian Art and Architecture from Protohistory to the Eighteenth century. Title: The shift from the ‘Aniconic’ to the ‘Iconic’ depiction of the Buddha in Early Indian art The shift from the ‘Aniconic’ to the ‘Iconic’ depiction of the Buddha in Early Indian art ‘Aniconic’ depiction of Buddha refers to those Buddhist images where various symbols related to Buddha’s life event were used to make his presence without making an anthropomorphic image of him. This definition is derived from the theory of ‘aniconism’ introduced by French scholar Alfred Foucher in the late nineteen century. The theory of aniconism refers to practice of early Buddhist art where symbols related to Buddha’s …show more content…

She presents a different view on aniconism. Though she did not dismiss Huntington’s theory of relics depicting sacred site, she added that there can also be additional meaning. She says that there can be multiple meanings in the symbols used in the sculptures, a relief may depict the site and at the same time also can depict the event. She used the term ‘emblem’ referring the various symbols used. She defined emblem as a picture that represent something different from itself. According to her an emblem like the stupa or the tree may contain more than one meaning. She agrees that all images identified as aniconic may not be aniconic but the existence of an aniconic phase cannot be denied. A relief may refer a holy site but it also can refer to the particular event of Buddha’s life. However Vidya Dahejia also agrees that Hinyana and Mahayana school coexisted. She added one more layer by saying that both these schools were interested in Buddha’s images, and it will be incorrect to associate one school to ‘aniconism’ and other to

Open Document