Analysis of The Cross and the Crescent

1484 Words3 Pages

Analysis of The Cross and the Crescent

Richard Fletcher has written The Cross and the Crescent an entertaining book that illustrates the early relationship between the Christians and Muslims. It helped me to understand the historical differences between the religions and to understand the reason for continued conflict, misunderstanding, and general uneasiness between the two groups. I will highlight some key historical events presented in the book and draw conclusions to almost modern day relations between the two religions. Additionally I will give an overall analysis of the book.

The Muslims have many critiques of the Christians and many of them are good points, while some are a bit of a stretch and even somewhat hypocritical. The main invalidation that Islam points out is the belief in the trinity while Christians still maintain that they are monotheistic. Additionally the dual nature of Christ is brought into light, because the Muslims believe their most important person to be Muhammad, merely an un-divine message receiver to god, they criticize the idea that Christ was both human and divine. The multiplicity of textual accounts, in the eyes of Islam, refutes the legitimacy of the accounts. However when they attempt to criticize the differing sects of Christianity they have no basis for argument as they themselves have had a similar split of beliefs between the Sunnis and Shi’ites. However I do think it prudent that the Muslims integrated societal law to be religious law because in emphasizes the necessity for there to be a non-secular set up to ingrain religious practice. The fact of the matter is that Muslims and Christians were in undesirable contact because of Muslims migrating into the empire or Christians and jews fleeing persecution, setting up churches, and developing a distinct arab Christian culture.

Christians too had discrepance’s with the Muslims because the bible explained that Ishmael would a wild person against the will of everyone, and everyone against him. Simply that passage from Genesis 16 explained their violent bloodthirsty behavior and forever labeled them outsiders as claimed by the word of god. Additionally the ethnicity of the Muslims, who claimed to be both descendent of both Hagar and Sarah, made them apparent unequals and enemies of the human race as a whole. However the Roman empire had use for such a people ...

... middle of paper ...

... agree on the progress of humanity and stop violence. Although we must note that Muslims in general to this day are tolerant.

Overall I enjoyed the book simply because it improved my overall knowledge of the historical background of Muslim belief and thought as well as interactions between they and Christianity. Like most historical documents its presentation can get a bit repetitive but its has a greater worth because I always find it interesting to complete my picture of the historical world behind me. I think most can agree that Richard Fletcher does well at attempting to keep our attention in keeping the book in the form of little historical stories at times. I do believe he needs to put something about the everyday society of people under some of these conditions, however drawing out his own opinion more could lead to greater overall speculation of his book. Anyone who wants an in depth view of the Muslim relationship with Christians should read this. Finally I believe he does a good job of keeping a non-biased point of view, resulting in my opinion that this book would also have value to Muslims and Christians wanting to know about the same subject or their history.

Open Document