Analysis Of White Ignorance By Charles Milles

857 Words2 Pages

The paper titled “White Ignorance” written by Charles Milles talks about ignorance within the white race and how it is a multidimensional entity; it’s mentioned there should be a sociology of ignorance. The boundaries for what is deemed as white ignorance is laid out in the paper. These boundaries serve as reminders to the reader that ignorance is not limited to only white people, and that not all whites are ignorant. White ignorance builds itself beyond refutation, to the point where anything outside the ordinary norms of white supremacy over other races is ignored. Writers seeking to expose the blindness that comes with this type of ignorance have come up with examples to try to show their point of view. One such writer by the name of Herman Melville wrote a novel called Benito Cerono, in …show more content…

Blacks allow the whites to deny the atrocities of slavery on their race, and others besides. This is a point that I disagree on, both sides of the conflict know what has occurred in the past, it isn’t as convoluted as Milles seems to portray in his paper. Milles says that facts get lost pertaining to interests of different groups, but hard facts such as Belgium was invaded by Germany on August 4th, 1914 cannot be disputed. As are the fact that blacks were treated less than humans by the whites cannot be argued against, with many examples in history supporting this fact. Furthermore, since both sides know the situation in their hearts and minds, the best thing to do is not to dwell on the past, but to figure out a road map for the future generations to come where this sort of oppression of a race does not occur. It isn’t an entanglement of denial that should be sought as listed by Milles but an absolute acceptance of the

Open Document