Analysis Of When The Levees Broke

1055 Words3 Pages

Hurricane Katrina has affected the lives of thousands of Americans. According to Anne Waple of NOAA’s National Climate Data Center, Katrina is “one of the most devastating natural disasters in recent US history” leaving “At least 80% of New Orleans…under flood water”. Film director, Spike Lee, in his documentary, When the Levees Broke, looks into the lives of the people of New Orleans that was affected by Hurricane Katrina. Lee’s purpose is to address racial disparities, political issues, and the discrimination against helping victims during the storm. He adopts a straightforward tone from the victims and outsiders in order to illustrate how the residents of New Orleans were affected by failures of the government for the duration of Katrina, before and after. Despite the government programs and their slow attempt to help, the government did not act quickly in the events of Hurricane Katrina because many residents of New Orleans did not receive the great amount of aid they were promised.
Lee uses logical appeals through testimonies of the victims and celebrities to appeal to America. According to Everything’s an Argument by Andrea A. Lunsford and John J. Ruszkiewiez, “Writers can support their arguments with all kinds of human experience presented in the form of narrative or testimony” (66). Footage from NBC’s telethon for raising money for the American Red Cross to help the victims of New Orleans was shown, which included rapper Kanye West and his controversial statement. He quoted the media’s portrayal of black people in New Orleans by implying “You see a black family, it says ‘They’re looting’. You see a white family, it says, ‘They’re looking for food’”. West’s argument is an example of a logical appeal because he was informing...

... middle of paper ...

...coast of the United States” (Waple). Katrina produced pervasive demolition in New Orleans and Spike Lee addressed many disparities. He did so by providing people the opportunity to understand those who were impacted by Hurricane Katrina through their stories and opinions. He appeals to the emotions of the audience by compiling stories, voices, images, and media coverage of the event. The government failed in providing appropriate help to the residents of New Orleans due to their slow reaction. In a number of days after the storm hit, help decided to arrive and many homes and lives already vanished due to the storm and the aftermath. With the use of logical, emotional, and ethical appeals, Lee was able to document a film to make his argument. The style of his argument persuaded Americans into believing that the government did not care about the people of New Orleans.

Open Document