Analysis Of The Woodstock Music Festival

1945 Words4 Pages

Peace, Love, and Music. The Woodstock Music Festival focused on these three things. Young people came from all over the country to go to Bethel, New York in 1969 to listen to many influential musicians perform. With about 400,000 participants, the venue was packed with not only people, but with drugs, sex, and alcohol. In the end, the concert-goers left with a different view of their lives and had developed a new philosophy of understanding, peace, and love. Although there were many obstacles in the planning, producing, and carrying out the event, Woodstock was a success in that it played a significant role in bringing young people together as one culture through community and music, and it became the symbol of the 1960’s American counterculture. …show more content…

The food supply was not enough for the huge mass of people. Likewise, sharing 600 portable bathrooms and inadequate water facilities was very hard with over 300,000 people. None of the organizers were prepared for the wave of bodies that formed. Many of the audience members got sick from a drug overdose, so to help get them out them concert, they hired helicopters to fly them out, because traffic was blocking all the streets. Casting an even blacker blanket over the happenings was the death of 17-year-old Raymond Mizak, who was run over by a tractor Saturday morning when he was laying in his sleeping bag. There was another death on Sunday from a drug overdose. This caused a lot of negative attitudes toward the …show more content…

For example, they focused on the fact that there were a lot of illegal drugs at Woodstock. The media made it seem like 99% of the festival-goers were smoking or doing drugs (Sheehy, 243). In addition, the young people who made Woodstock so historic were not interviewed by the reporters covering the story. There were 3 young people interviewed, however, none of them talked about the cultural impact it had on them. The public nudity and casual sex was noted in Woodstock news reports. This reflected the points of tension between the older and younger generations, where the older Americans saw it as a threat to the social order (Sheehy, 243).
However, some news reports took time to focus on cultural impacts of the festival. The Times magazine quoted one of the promoters, Michael Lang, in a sidebar. He talked about how the youth culture “came out of the alleys and the streets.” He recognized that the youth wanted and valued more than material things: “they valued each other” (Sheehy, 243). They also quoted another promoter, John Roberts: “. . . we felt that a cultural exposition created by youth could be of inestimable value in bridging the gap” (Sheehy,

Open Document