Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on skyscrapers
Essay on skyscrapers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on skyscrapers
In her book “The Tall Building Artistically Reconsidered”, architecture critic Ada Louise Huxtable discusses the skyscraper. Huxtable composed a response to Louis Sullivan’s manifesto, “The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered”, which was composed in 1896. In his manifesto, Sullivan states, “It is the pervading law of all … true manifestations of the head, of the heart, of the soul, that the life is recognizable in its expression, that form ever follows function. This is the law.” Sullivan argued that a building’s exterior should reflect the interior functions. The problem with the skyscraper is not a technical one, but an artistic one. Huxtable’s view on the form and function of the skyscraper successfully follows Sullivan’s beliefs. …show more content…
In her introduction, she discusses one of the first versions of a skyscraper, The Tower of Babel: “From the Tower of Babel onward, the fantasies of builders have been vertical rather than horizontal.” Changes in urban life allowed architects to design taller and higher-density spaces. In compact cities that are increasing in population, the smartest way to build is in the vertical direction. Huxtable believes that there is not a single design approach to the skyscraper: “The question of how to design the tall building has never really been resolved.” American architects have designed skyscrapers since the late 1800s. The modern skyscraper is considered an American invention. Sullivan’s emphasis on form and function characterized the first skyscrapers, which appeared in Chicago and New York. In her article, Huxtable calls the skyscraper “this century’s most stunning architectural phenomenon.” American architects have successfully designed and built multiple skyscrapers. All over the world, skyscrapers are increasing in size and number, which will either benefit or be detrimental to the lives of the city’s
In his opinionated book, From Bauhaus to Our House, Tom Wolfe describes his views on the way architecture has framed our modern world. He frames his book long essay with an excerpt from America the Beautiful, "O Beautiful, for spacious skies, for amber waves of grain, has there ever been another place on earth where so many people of wealth and power have paid for and put up with so much architecture they detested as within thy blessed borders today? . . . Every child goes to school in a building that looks like a duplicating-machine replacement-parts wholesale distribution warehouse . . . Every new $900,000 summer house in the north woods of Michigan or on the shore of Long Island has so many pipe railings, ramps, hob-tread metal spiral stairways, sheets of industrial plate glass, banks of tungsten-halogen lamps, and white cylindrical shapes, it looks like an insecticide refinery." (Wolfe 1) This quote, in short, is the premise of his critique. He does not like the way modern architecture
The late 19th and early 20th century was an important time and turning point in the eventual development of skyscrapers. It is during this time that various technological and design aspects that would eventually shape the future of skyscrapers started to gain root. Two important buildings developed between this time periods include the Empire State building in New York and Monadnock building in Chicago. Although they were built about 40 years apart, they are much more similar than one would imagine. They both were of great significance and impact on the design, economics, and society although they were built in completely different eras.
James F. O'Gorman, Dennis E. McGrath. ABC of Architecture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998. Document. October 2013.
Louis Sullivan is an inventor of American architecture. His work influenced a generation of architects. Although many people criticized his work, contradicting his theory, it wasn’t true. He said “Whatever is beautiful rests on the foundation of the necessary.” Suggesting the importance of function as well as ornaments.
Nesbitt, Kate. Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory: 1965-1995. New York: Princeton Architectural, 1996. Print.
“In the 1870’s, buildings rarely exceeded four stories.” It wasn’t until the improvement of iron and steel as a structurally sound material that the taller buildings became the real world. These advancements in architecture allowed architects of that era to experiment. The bulk of skyscraper advancement can be linked to the shocking fire that cleared most of Chicago in 1871. City officials changed from wood to firepr...
From the early Greek temples of yesteryear, to the high-tech autonomous buildings of tomorrow, the question of whether the function of a building or its aesthetics qualities are more important has plagued the minds of architects around the world. Webster's II New College Dictionary (Please do not use the encyclopedia or the dictionary to open your essay--way too high school.) defines aesthetics as "The branch of philosophy that provides a theory of the beautiful and of the fine arts" (18). The definition of Functionalism is defined by Webster's as "The doctrine that the function of an object should determine its design and materials" (453). Now, if the function of an object decides the type of design and materials used how does one integrate aesthetics into design, and moreover, how important are aesthetics to an architect? Frank Lloyd Wright was one of the greatest and most renowned architects of the 19th and 20th centuries, and while his buildings where lauded for displaying great artistic design, the issue of function was compromised by the blatant fact that his roofs leaked. This is because he let the aesthetics of his buildings become the focus of the structure, and neglected to adequately address the function of the building allowing for this problem to take root in his designs (Palermo, 4 Mar. 1999). As is apparent from Frank Lloyd Wright, there is a certain balance that has to be attained between aesthetics and functionalism in order for a structure to be appreciated as a successful building.
For thesis, I’ll delve into the architects who believes in form follow function and on the building often looks simple from outside but simply concern their performance as per the user’s requirements who use them. The appearance of the building is followed by the function of the building which is obtained accidentally after the process of designing to accomplish the requirement of the user. For exampl...
Frank Lloyd Wright has been called “one of the greatest American architect as well as an Art dealer that produced a numerous buildings, including houses, resorts, gardens, office buildings, churches, banks and museums. Wright was the first architect that pursues a philosophy of truly organic architecture that responds to the symphonies and harmonies in human habitats to their natural world. He was the apprentice of “father of Modernism” Louis Sullivan, and he was also one of the most influential architects on 20th century in America, Wright is idealist with the use of elemental theme and nature materials (stone, wood, and water), the use of sky and prairie, as well as the use of geometrical lines in his buildings planning. He also defined a building as ‘being appropriate to place’ if it is in harmony with its natural environment, with the landscape (Larkin and Brooks, 1993).
These three phenomena basically outlined the search for an economical utilitarian architecture, an architecture that would use the new materials and still appeal to aesthetic taste. Technology is key in this transition from tradition. The availability of cheap mass-produced iron and steel ultimately rendered masonry construction obsolete. “The International Style was thus formed under the dictates that modern buildings’ form and appearance should naturally grow out of and express the potentialities of their materials and structural engineering. A harmony between artistic expression, function, and technology would thus be established in an austere and disciplined new architecture.”
In general, modern architecture is characterized by the simplification of form and the creation of ornaments from structures and themes of buildings. As stated by US General Service administration (2003), it is a term applied to an overarching movement, with its exact definition and scope varying widely [US General Service administration (2003)]. Form follows function is a famous principle associated with the modern architecture as well as industrial designs of 20th century. This principle stated that the shape of a building or object should primarily be based upon its intended function or purpose. This particular essay going to illustrate the following questions from historical and contextual basis. How did Louis H. Sullivan’s “form follows function” turn out to be the fundamental concept of modernist architecture? What did drive Louis H. Sullivan to construct his famous philosophy “Form follows function”? From different perspective to argue that question, it will be considered whether “form follows function” was the fundamental concept of modern architecture or not. To argue with that, understanding about the philosophy “form follows function” and modernist architecture is necessary.
Frank Lloyd Wright and Le Corbusier are two very prominent names in the field of architecture. Both architects had different ideas concerning the relationship between humans and the environment. Their architectural styles were a reflection of how each could facilitate the person and the physical environment. Frank Lloyd Wright’s Robie House, is considered one of the most important buildings in the history of American architecture and Le Corbusier s Villa Savoye helped define the progression that modern architecture was to take in the 20th Century. Both men are very fascinating and have strongly influenced my personal taste for modern architecture. Although Wright and Corbusier each had different views on how to design a house, they also had similar beliefs. This paper is a comparison of Frank Lloyd Wright‘s and Le Corbusier ‘s viewpoints exhibited through their two prominent houses, Frank Lloyd Wright’s Robie House and Le Corbusier’s Villa Savoye.
When we think of towering skyscrapers, we don’t think about all the components required to build that structure. We look up in awe at the buildings height and beauty and never give a thought to structural design investigation, structural mechanics and all the hard work that goes into building a magnificent structure.
While walking among skyscrapers in Hong Kong, I am always astonished by the city’s unique creative structures and spaces. Just imagining myself engaging with space and culture to design a piece of art to set amongst these great masterpieces thrills me. These innovations are what genuinely cause me to crave a deeper understanding of the field and inspire me to learn more about the intricacies of architecture.
The future of skyscrapers is in the hands of environmental and architectural engineers that can develop sustainable and cost-effective buildings for commercial and residential use. If skyscrapers can be perfected, as monuments of consumerism and capitalism, the future for them should be in the hands of the people who they once thrived off of. Skyscrapers are used for the majority of the time as corporate offices but, the ability to build space vertically, safely, is so innovative in helping to pacify the global population crisis, and reducing the homeless population.