Analysis Of Shulamite's The Song Of Songs

722 Words2 Pages

The Song of Songs is an undoubtedly unlikely addition to the Hebrew Bible given Christianity’s many constraints upon sexuality. Despite its often being presented as allegory, the poem remains a primarily erotic text due to its lack of deity and inconsistency with Christian law. Yet even when categorized as an erotic text, many aspects of the poem are remarkable considering the highly traditional, male-dominated civilization it originated from. The Song of Songs questions the patriarchal society of its time via a female-centric narration of a woman embracing her sexuality. While the poem’s authorship has been ascribed — albeit questionably — to King Solomon, the narrating voice is predominantly female. Male-centeredness is an aspect of all …show more content…

Their respect for one another is evident in their mutual praise and admiration. In verses 2:2-3, the lover’s declaration, “Like a lily in a field of thistles, such is my love among the young women,” is paralleled by the Shulamite’s response; “And my beloved among the young men is a branching apricot tree in the wood.” In fact, the male in the poem does not seem to ascribe to most traditional standards of masculinity; in their relationship, the woman freely proclaims her desire (3:1) and seems to initiate lovemaking on more than one occasion (4:16, as well as 7:13, “Let us go early to the vineyards … there I will give you my love”). Romantic initiative is a traditionally male trait in a patriarchal society, due to the perception that women are subservient to men. Furthermore, the male lover seems to trust in his partner’s fidelity (8:12) rather than attempt to control her the way most men of that era would. The Shulamite’s partner retains strength and masculinity in the same way she retains her femininity; however, they manage to share equal …show more content…

In the patriarchal Hebrew society, women are expected to repress their sexual urges for the sake of chastity. Even the mildest public displays of affection were scorned (8:1). The woman’s brothers offer the best illustration of this norm in verse 8:8: “We have a little sister and she has no breasts. What shall we do for our sister when suitors besiege her?” The men of the family choose to ignore the Shulamite’s maturity and autonomy. In fact, in verse 8:9, it becomes apparent that they consider their sister property to be controlled: “If she is a wall, we will build a silver turret upon her. If she is a door, we will bolt her with beams of cedarwood.” Even her lover idolizes female virginity in verse 4:12: “An enclosed garden is my sister, my bride, a hidden well, a sealed spring.” In verse 8:10, we see the Shulamite’s response to her brothers: “I am a wall and my breasts are towers. But for my lover I am a city of peace.” Here, — defying sociocultural norms — the Shulamite asserts that she is strong and capable; she gains independence by embracing her sexuality in the context of a trusting

Open Document