Analysis Of Teaching Peace Nonviolence And The Liberal Arts

433 Words1 Page

Teaching Peace Nonviolence and the Liberal Arts: David Janzen says, “One difficulty with the violent image of God is that it appears to construe God as a rather capricious being, changing the divine mind from one setting to the next.” This argument is very helpful with giving me a voice for challenging or offering a new lens for those of the African American tradition to view the images of God. Janzen offers help to us for viewing a God who “could not demand killing or enforce capital punishment, or sanction genocide” if we are to view this God through Jesus Christ. This reading also caused me to reassess the way in which I view the biblical canon as a whole. If we are to be true to the Trinitarian theology that we confess then how can we present one as violent and the other as peaceful?
Word Count:139
God Does Not Demand Blood: …show more content…

Bell offers a great statement about the redemptive work of Christ viewed through the cross. He argues, “Jesus comes to us in love to renew the friendship/communion that we rejected. Jesus come to us with the offer of friendship with God. It is not violence of the cross that saves us. Rather, it is the love of God expressed in Jesus that saves us.” This argument is also helpful in understanding how Jesus work is redemptive for us and that it is not with the violent means of the cross. Bell presents the Christian faith with a true picture of how Christ work with love redeems humanity, and not the blood that was shed. We do not serve a God, who is seeking after blood like a

Open Document