Analysis Of Sex And The Single Girl

889 Words2 Pages

The Broke Female

The 60’s was certainly a time of women’s curiosity and venture outside of the norm “homemaker” role. Women not only found pleasure in the world, but in themselves as a whole and as a woman. Sex and the Single Girl by Helen Gurley Brown played an important role here as her intent was to guide women - or more specifically the single woman - in her pursuit of independence and pleasure. Sex and the Single Girl most definitely lead the readers on to believe that it was to empower women; even to break away from the norm and advocate the unattached female. My response will focus on the contradictory nature the guidebook, and other literature like Cosmopolitan, create when advising a woman to do and be something on the one hand while having an underlying message on the other. Nothing has more of an effect to the controversial conversation of women’s liberation than literature. The subtle cues from Cosmopolitan emphasizing femininity: beauty, sensuality, appreciating the female body… Self-help guidebooks persisting the woman to let go and just be free for once. It is liberating for the woman to see such medias to act upon what they were thinking and to even go beyond that. Talks of
Have clean hair but no body hair, smile on cue, the right amount of gossip, tight but fitting clothing and lingerie, perfume, good health and enthusiasm...these are just to name a few! (pp. 79-80). It’s as if women need to literally hand over their souls and wallets to get a man to notice her. Brown’s guidebook defends its stances beforehand by stating “Obviously these accessories haven’t anything to do with our intrinsic worth as women” (p. 76) but also offhandedly affirms “You must spend time plotting how to make him happier” (p. 82). Sex and the Single Girl is seen as empowering to the woman, yet at the same time, it is degrading to the woman by setting a personal standard of beauty and expectations to land a

Open Document