Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
War poems dramatic imagery
War poems dramatic imagery
War poems dramatic imagery
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: War poems dramatic imagery
INTRODUCTION
How many wars and battles the humankind went through ? How many times the same territory was a place for different battles ? How people understand and portray something that is called "war" ? I have chosen The Battle of Quebec (1759), with the aim to look deeply at the most famous and glorious battle I have ever heard . I have determined different pieces of work, which illustrate people's vision and understanding of battle, and suggest what it felt like. Firstly, the painting by Benjamin West " The Death of General James Wolfe" as a visual image, that can tell us a lot about how people pictured something in its entirety. Secondly, the poem by Lewis Paul Hyatt "The Battle of Quebec", which reveals important details through
…show more content…
It illustrates the moment of the death, which brings on the feeling of grief and sadness, in contrast with joy about the victory. The history sources add, that General Wolfe found out about the British victory right before the actual death, it was the last thing he had heard, so it is also a moment of a great happiness. And if we pay attention on the sky, we will see, that half of it filled with clouds and another half (where we can see the messenger with good news) is clear. I am positive that it is what makes this painting so powerful for me, the description of light and darkness at the same moment. Furthermore, I see on this painting the direct connection, or even equation, that shows people's thoughts and feelings about war. For me painting is clearly say : " War = Death".
So, this painting creates a visual depiction of what people think and feel. The next two pieces create a different kind of impression, they are not showing us how it look directly, it is not something we can see with our eyes.
The poem was written by Lewis Paul Hyatt, who dedicated his life to history, and wrote 640 poems . The poem " The Battle of Quebec" was included in his first release "My
…show more content…
It demonstrates what kind of patriotic person he was, even in the last minutes of his life he cares about destiny of his country
To compare the painting and the poem is difficult, because I feel that they complement each other, the painting is something you see while you're reading poem, and poem is a background of picture. However the painting is dedicated to General Wolfe, and the poem briefly telling the story in a right order with all historical nuances . I think the author is trying to explain the historical context using the simplest poetry language.
The third piece of work is the song "Bold General Wolfe" performed by Maddy Prior and her daughter Rose Kemp (with lyrics quite similar to the Watersons' version) at Cecil Sharp House, London, on October 23, 2008. The main difference is that it feels like the story is told not by spectator but by direct participant , by soldier for instance. Furthermore, various instruments add solemnity to the sounding of the song. The lyrics of the songs is even more emphasizing the patriotism of General Wolfe in lines : "Old England, she shall win today". And the last words of General Wolfe described differently, he refers to his home and asks to pass "goodbye" to his mother :" And tell my tender old mother dear, That I am dead, oh, I am dead, oh, And never shall see her no more". And here is a screaming sign of his patriotic heart, before he calls his homeland "Old England" and he uses the same adjective
Wayne, transforms this painting into a three dimensional abstract piece of art. The focal point of the painting are the figures that look like letters and numbers that are in the front of the piece of art. This is where your eyes expend more time, also sometimes forgiving the background. The way the artist is trying to present this piece is showing happiness, excitement, and dreams. Happiness because he transmits with the bright colours. After probably 15 minutes on front of the painting I can feel that the artist tries to show his happiness, but in serene calm. The excitement that he presents with the letters, numbers and figures is a signal that he feels anxious about what the future is going to bring. Also in the way that the colors in the background are present he is showing that no matter how dark our day can be always will be light to
The view of the painting brings to mind the all the senses. Smell is the first to come to mind as the smoke from the candle billows up, the burning smell reaches the noise as well as the burning cigar. The fruity smell overshadows that of the smell of chicken and peas. The noise of a dropped tray and the breaking of glass as it hits the floor makes everyone turn to the right. People talking over each other to be heard. All of the senses are realized as the painting is viewed.
My initial thought about this painting is that it seems to be incorrect. The reflection in the mirror shows that the lady is looking in the direction of the man standing in front of her. If the lady is looking at the man their reflections should not be off to the side. The second observation is the lady is sad or disappointed and is looking past the man standing in front of her. My last observation is there are three sections from left to right; bottles and the audience, the lady, and the reflections of the lady and man. The most interesting concept about this artwork is how the reflections seem to be inaccurate. If the bottles and the reflections of the lady and the man standing in front of her are at an angle, then why are the vertical lines perpendicular to each other?
Quebec’s social identity and defining characteristics contradict and conflict with those of rest of Canada. Since the genesis of our country, the political, social disagreements, and tensions between Quebec and the rest of Canada have been unavoidable. Utilizing Hiller’s key contradictions in the analysis of a Canadian society, we will compare and contrast the nature of the societal identity in Quebec compared to that of rest of Canada, emphasising on the major differences and tensions between the province and the rest of the country.
The siege of Quebec was a chess match between two men, Major-General James Wolfe of the British army, and Marquis de Montcalm of the French military. Major-General James Wolfe had been in service to the British army since the age of fifteen. However, his involvement in the army started at age thirteen and a half when he volunteered to go with his father on the Carthegena Expedition. Luckily for him he became ill and was sent home before setting sail. The Carthegena Expedition was a terrible excursion and took the lives of many stronger men to severe fever. It was inconceivable that a boy of Wolfe’s age at the time would have survived such an expedition. Officially enlisting at the age of fifteen, James Wolfe had all the makings of a military prodigy. In fact, it was documented that for his leave from the army after being named lieutenant-colonel that he wanted to study artillery and engineering at Metz but was refused. Wolfe was able to successfully gain rank at a young age through diligence on the battlefield, and great military understanding. Major-General Wolfe understood the military better than most everybody he acted as a subordinate. Wolfe felt that there were problems with the British military due to political appointments where military appointments were needed. On top of this, Wolfe deemed chivalry one of the most important qualities of a strong military. During the Jacobite revolution Wo...
When looking at the painting it gives us a glimpse of the past. It looks almost like a photograph. The fine detail from the building on the right with the statue on top. The citizens walking around.
I will compare the emotions that both artworks send to the viewers when they first look at them. When I look at the portray 1, I fell sadness. That’s what the artwork is conveying to me. No one in the picture is happy or smiling. Everyone is sad, upset or indifferent. When we look at their gaze, the father is looking traight away, with tired eyes. His gesture shows that he doesn’t want to hear what his wife has to say and is asking her to stop. The mother’s gaze is on something in front of them. Her eyes are big and she seems to be giving more attention to things than the man. She seems sad sad to be spoken that way. On portray 2, the atmosphere is visibly different. The man and woman have a little smile on their faces and the kids are playing next to them. The people in the portray don’t look indifferent to each other or sad like in the other portray, they look pleased and caring. The man and women gaze are relaxed and they seem to be enjoying themselves. They are looking straight away in a pose as if someone is taking a picture of them. The kids gaze are in their
Canada: The Quiet Revolution in Quebec The English-French relations have not always been easy. Each is always arguing and accusing the other of wrong doings. All this hatred and differences started in the past, and this Quiet revolution, right after a new Liberal government led by Jean Lesage came in 1960. Thus was the beginning of the Quiet Revolution.
In September 1758, General Jeffery Amherst attacked Louisburg, the frontier fortress of Canada. Major General James Wolfe was second in command. There was only two years difference between the too men. The Fort on Cape Breton Island was the key to the gateway of the St Lawrence River. (Britannica vol. 8) Whoever held the fort had the key to the heart of Canada.
Sutherland, Maxwell. “Armstrong, Lawrence.” Dictionary of Canadian Biography, 2. (1969). Accessed 11 November 2013. http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/armstrong_lawrence_2E.html.
An unfortunate placement, General St. Clair’s forces were discouraged, malnourished, over worked and complacent setting the stage for the upcoming defeat. They had setup camp on the frigid night of the 3rd of November, 1791 without fear of any enemy, even though there had been spotting of enemy along their route. The next morning, as complacency in full gear, Soldiers stacked their arms and commenced to eat breakfast, completely unaware they were being watched and about to come under attack. Apart from their arms, they were either bunched up or scattered while eating, unorganized and unprepared for the assault that was about to take place.
acquired by Great Britain in the Treaty of Paris of 1763. The mass majority of
images in this painting, all of which have the power to symbolize to us, the viewer, of the painter’s
The painting is organized simply. The background of the painting is painted in an Impressionist style. The blurring of edges, however, starkly contrasts with the sharp and hard contours of the figure in the foreground. The female figure is very sharp and clear compared to the background. The background paint is thick compared to the thin lines used to paint the figures in the foreground. The thick paint adds to the reduction of detail for the background. The colors used to paint the foreground figures are vibrant, as opposed to the whitened colors of the Impressionist background. The painting is mostly comprised of cool colors but there is a range of dark and light colors. The light colors are predominantly in the background and the darker colors are in the foreground. The vivid color of the robe contrasts with the muted colors of the background, resulting in an emphasis of the robe color. This emphasis leads the viewer's gaze to the focal part of the painting: the figures in the foreground. The female and baby in the foreground take up most of the canvas. The background was not painted as the artist saw it, but rather the impression t...
To me the painting is a way of showing you what everyone else is seeing. That the painter had the men looking right at each other so they can see themselves running away. In turn I got to see myself doing the same thing and was able to change because of it. When other people look at the painting they probably see something else. That is why I choose to do the painting, it gives you the choice too interpret it any way you see fit. Or it can just be a beautiful painting to look at, but the painting was so much more to me. It painted a thousand words for me.