Analysis Of Pope Leo XIII: What Is A Just Wage

1498 Words3 Pages

Christina Peterman Ms. Briones Morality Period 2 16 May 2014 Honorbound What is a Just Wage? Leo XIII. "Rerum Novarum." Vatican.va. Vatican, 15 May 1891. Web. 10 May 2014. Pope Leo XIII says that although we must always take care of the workingman and do what we can to improve his life, we must not confuse this with the socialist removal of private property. Stressing the fact that the owning of private property is in fact in accordance with God’s design for the universe, the Pope then widens his argument by saying it is the father’s duty to provide for his wife and children as the case may be. Therefore, it is not the duty of the government to provide for the family, because that duty lies with the father. In order to do this, the father or any worker must be paid a fair and just wage for the work that they completed. Pope Leo recognizes, however, that numerous factors must be considered in order to find a wage that is truly just. He supports his point of providing a just wage by pointing out that what the wealthy have received is a gift from God, and they should use it for the good of all—and one way in which they can do that is by paying a just wage to those that they employ. Coming from a Pope of the Catholic Church, Pope Leo XIII, I can be quite certain that the ideas expressed are accurate as well as in line with the Church’s perspective. The numerous quotes and footnotes inform me that this encyclical was extensively researched and is therefore quite useful. Although I was at first concerned by the fact that it was published in 1891, reading the encyclical convinced me that the ideas expressed therein are just as valid today as they were more than a century ago. It is for these reasons and the fact that I know I can pl... ... middle of paper ... ...air and right, and the government should not interfere in this matter according to Dorn. He claims that it is this freedom to choose what to pay workers, this unregulated economy that will provide the best environment for workers to succeed and move up in their jobs. Dorn’s perspective, although backed with statistics and published in a reputable magazine, fails to take into account many factors including human dignity. His arguments for abolishing the minimum wage do not take into account the standard of living or family of those workers making the minimum the government will allow businesses to pay them. Also, this perspective fails to take into account the businesses who would take advantage of the lack of a federally mandated minimum wage, and instead of using the “freedom” to allow workers to rise within the company would use it to keep workers in poverty.

Open Document