Analysis Of Poe's The Purloined Letter

1503 Words4 Pages

In Barbara Johnson’s “Writing”, she explains a part of Lacan’s interpretation of “The Purloined Letter”, saying “Neither the letter’s content (the never revealed signifier) nor the individual identities of the people (the psychological equivalent of Saussure’s ivory and wood chessmen) determine the course of the plot” (42). It is neither the scandal that is threatened nor those who are being threatened that dominate the plot, as is to be expected in so many mystery stories. Poe turns these expectations on its head, giving only the bare minimum needed to understand what is going on. In John T Irwin’s essay, “Detective Fiction as High Art”, he mentions a quote from Jorge Luis Borges, stating that “… the solution of a mystery is always less impressive …show more content…

However, Poe’s “The Purloined Letter” manages to be satisfying in both its simplistic mystery and twist ending. He does this by avoiding the pomp and glamour usually associated with the initial mystery and giving us the simplest facts, in order to show us where the specific importance of detection and ultimately analysis truly lies.
The lack of a specific content-driven plot is seen primarily in the veil surrounding the purloined letter and in the lack of information given about any character except maybe Dupin. There are a number of roads Poe could have gone down, in relations to both of these ideas. With simply the content of the letter, there could have been so many interesting plot choices done here. Everyone has seen a Bond film or a Sherlock Holmes where it’s the specifics of the details that hold all the allure. However, in choosing to deny us the specifics, it somehow seems to increase the threat of the letter, not diminish it in the slightest. There is a sense of mystery maintained around the story because despite the Dupin inflicting a resolution, we as readers do not know everything. Thus, we …show more content…

For him, this whole process of uncovering where the letter is and taking it from the Minister D____ is about revenge. For some unknown to us reason, Dupin feels slighted by the Minister and thus deserves to be shown up. This is the most important thing for Dupin. And since Dupin is the one delegating to the narrator, who is acting as Dupin’s filterer of information for the reader, then we thus only are allowed to know what Dupin finds important. And to Dupin, the particularities of the affair going on between the King and the Queen and the specific goals of the Minister and the lack of punishment for what is in the letter, all of that means nothing to him. It is not important. What is important to him is the acquisition of knowledge through detection, all of this geared towards how best to enact his revenge. To reiterate, all the knowledge and information we receive is from Dupin, or the narrator’s interpretation of Dupin. He is the only light we are provided in this dark room of contemplation. So, when he regales this information, he is not giving it to the Prefect of the Police or even the Minister. He is giving this re-count of what happened to his friend, his confidant, and thus he would only say what is particularly important to

Open Document