Analysis Of My Encounter With Princeton Police By Imani Perry

706 Words2 Pages

This analysis will be examining the article “my encounter with Princeton police” by Imani Perry a female black professor at ivy –League University in New Jersey. Perry was pulled over by Princeton police while she was driving 67mph on street with 45mph limit. At which time, the police found warrant for arrest for two unpaid ticket. For these reason, Perry got handcuffed and taken into custody. The conclusion of this argument is clearly police are using inappropriate and disproportionate treatment against African Americans. The author set her argument on two strong primary assumptions. First, police are using disposition in racially discriminatory fashion to ward black Americans. Second, it presumed in this society we found ourselves, sanction …show more content…

Police are using modern license plate reader technology that can read on spot and collect general information about the vehicle and the driver. The technology helps the police to get information; however, the police decides who to stop for violation. There are tremendous evidence that indicates African Americans men and women pulled over by police for minor traffic violation but ends up on body and vehicle search. This fact indicates discretion is exercised in the way one feels racial profiled. In the meantime, police are using these information collected to target African Americans like Imani Perry. Secondly, the author assumes police treated her wrongly and unfavorably because she is African American. Race and class remains an important social factor in understanding disparities in many important parts of life. Even though there is no simple way to show that a correlation between her case and wide police practice, her personal experience is quite similar with most African Americans victim of bad policing. Some critics may also assume this as an isolated …show more content…

Her tone is calm and professional throughout her argument, her purpose for writing is clear as to inform her social media followers. Furthermore, Perry employed ethos, Logos and pathos. First, she established ethos by identifying herself as a professor who teaches African American history. Her extrinsic ethos is strong because she able to give plenty of evidence to her audience about her credibility. For example, when she mentioned about police discretion is exercised, she included that she witnessed thousands of illegal acts that went unpunished in white dominant area while she lives there. Perry’s intrinsic ethos is as strong as extrinsic ethos. She exhibits an outstanding confidence in her articles. Her expression revels that she is one that to be taken seriously by her audience. For example, the way she said how illegal activity handled in this country especially in a police department. Even though Perry’s article is weak in pathetic appeal, her audience may feel sympathy for her experience of being handcuffed on her artistic wrist, and her word choice like “my people…..naked vulnerability over and over again”. In the meantime, Perry’s argument is supported by her use of logical appeal to her audience. For example she uses the following words to show logical appeals” lenience is the rule rather than exception.” And “perfection is not required for white citizenship, it should

Open Document