Analysis Of Medicalization Of Childbirth

1314 Words3 Pages

Childbirth and pregnancy are concepts as old as time. For as long as humans existed women have been bearing children naturally and only recently has modern medicine become intertwined with the birthing process. This recent coming together of medicine and childbirth is called medicalization. The medicalization of childbirth was born in the 17th C, and by the 20th C the majority of births had become medicalize (Wilson, 1995). Today, many have questioned the medicalization of childbirth and whether or not it has done more harm or good to this once completely natural process. Two articles “Medicalization, Natural Childbirth and Birthing Experiences” by Sarah Brubaker and Heather Dillaway, and “Revisiting the Critique of Medicalized Childbirth” …show more content…

Similarly, in “Revisiting the Critique of Medicalized Childbirth”, Fox and Worts contest the feminist argument against medicalization of childbirth. The feminist critique of medicalization of childbirth center around who has control during birthing, where is the setting of the childbirth, and the use of medical technology as interventions during childbirth. In terms of control, feminists argue that medicalization of childbirth make women lose control over their own body and as a result, lose control of the birthing of their child. They also argue that women are the true medical experts, and it is their control over the process of labor that is worthy and thus seen as superior to the authority of medical experts. Therefore women must exude control over childbirth in terms of setting and no use of medical interventions. However, Fox and Worts research showed that despite the feminist critiques, many women are quite satisfied with their hospital deliveries and accept medical interventions during the birthing process. Likewise, Brubaker and Dillaway exemplified that women do not lose control over the birthing process through medicalization but rather by other processes to be discussed later. Both sets of authors attempt to reconcile these disparities between the feminist critique of the medicalization of the birthing process and the actual …show more content…

However, there is so much more to what medicalization gas done to the childbirth process. A con is that medicalization of childbirth this completely overlooks that there are patients who request for medical interventions prior to, or during childbirth. Conversely, a pro is that the feminist critique highlights a consequence of medicalization in that it removes women from the social event in which the mother is surrounded by friends, relatives, and continuous support. Fox and Worts show that women who avoid medical interventions actually rely on support from others in order to take on the additional responsibility of properly taking care of a child. When medical interventions take a play in a mother’s birthing experience it “offers support at arm’s length - to the body and nothing more - and withdraws abruptly following the delivery of a healthy baby.” In other words, medicalization can serve as a rude awakening to mother’s that the more long-term care and responsibility of caring for her child is left to the mother alone. It is this responsibility that leaves women depressed post delivery according to Fox and Worts. This need of a social support raises the paradox that for women to have control over the birthing process, no matter the setting or intervention used, autonomy does not rest on the presence of

Open Document