Analysis Of Kurt Vonnegut's Galapagos

1188 Words3 Pages

Kurt Vonnegut’s Galapagos tells the tale of shipwrecked humans stranded on an island called Saint Rosalia in the Galapagos archipelago. Meanwhile, in the other parts of the world, a virus wipes away humanity. The castaways, supposedly the only human beings to not have contracted the virus eventually evolve into furry beings resembling seals which took million years. The narrator, Leon Trout is a ghost that silently observed and documented the human evolution. The narrator often interjects with a contrast between the humans of today to the primitive aquatic version of humans of a million years later. This interjection along with the characterization provides the readers with a satirical albeit somewhat cynical view of the human intelligence. …show more content…

The captain is characterized as incompetent even at sailing a ship despite his title. The captain should have been the one to lead the castaways but his incompetence caused the island dwellers to despise him. Ten years after being marooned on the island, “the captain become a very boring person, without enough to think about, without enough to do.”(294). Trying to find a purpose to his boring life, the captain hovered around a spring, the island’s only water supply. He would tell the kanka-bono girls the kind of mood the spring was in on that day despite the fact that “The dribbling [from the spring] was in fact quite steady, and had been for thousands of years”(295). The kanka-bono girls did not speak english and therefore the captain’s attempt at humanising the spring were lost on the girls making it a completely pointless endeavor. Moreover,If not for the lack of tools on the island, the captain would have tried to improve the springs and consequently might have clogged it(296) potentially putting the life of castaways at risk. The captain was desperate to find a purpose to his mundane life on the island, so much that he was willing to put his and the island’s inhabitant 's life at risk. The captain’s attempt at accomplishing something to find a purpose in his life was useless and even …show more content…

Writing a book in air is extremely pointless because a book is usually meant to be read. Even if it was hypothetically possible to read words in the air, it was useless since the humans of million years later would not be able to read it anyways. However, unlike the other characters, Leon realized the uselessness of human accomplishments. Referring to his book written in the air, he says “My words will be as enduring as anything my father writer, or Shakespeare wrote or Beethoven wrote, or Darwin wrote.”(318). After a million years, human beings ended up having smaller brain. They lost the capacity to understand Beethoven’s or Shakespeare’s work. Even if they were to understand these works, they wouldn’t care about it since they are preoccupied by avoiding sharks and survival in genera . All of great artist’s accomplishments were pointless in the long run. In the end, “it was the best fisherfolk who survived in the greatest numbers”(319). All that mattered in the end was survival and humans trying to find a purpose to their life by trying to accomplish great deeds such as writing the ninth symphony was

Open Document