Analysis Of Jon Krakauer's Into Thin Air

708 Words2 Pages

Imagine feeling guilty for making it out alive on a journey. In the nonfiction novel, Into Thin Air, by Jon Krakauer, he documents his journey to the summits of Mount Everest and ultimately accuses himself for holding acquisitiveness responsibility for the disaster on the mountain. After realizing only one-fourth of the people that climbed to the summits on May 10, 1996, made it down back to base camp alive, Krakauer theorizes about why that was so. He attributes most of the reason for the disaster to the erratic weather along with hubris, he wanted for the thought of leading a group to the mountain. Despite those reasons, there is no ultimate reason for the deaths documented in the book, but bottom line the climbers that died didn’t thoroughly comprehend the danger they were going to encounter as a consequence that contributes to the disaster.

Ever since people knew it was possible to reach the summits of Mount Everest about 4,000 people have attempted to climb it and a one in four ratio of people have died from doing so. “Once Everest was determined to be the highest summit on earth, it was only a matter of time before people decided that Everest needed to be climbed” (Krakauer 13). The very first person to reach the summits of Mount Everest was in 1953 also ever since then about seven percent out of every 4,000
Ultimately there is no specific reason to blame for the disaster that happened, nevertheless greed, selfishness, erratic weather and misinterpreted information contribute to the deaths. Conclusively, most of the climbers themselves that died hold a great responsibility for their own death for the sake of their lack of knowledge on what they were encountering for their greed along with their selfishness. They knew they were on the most dangerous mountain in the world as a consequence, sadly, greed and selfishness got in the way of their own

Open Document