Analysis Of Jack Kerouac's On The Road

1591 Words4 Pages

Jack Kerouac’s “On the Road” encompasses ideas of the beat generation, takes you along, and allows you to see the people and the situations of America at a time immediately following World War II; how people lived, and how, at least in Sal’s case, people changed. Kerouac exemplifies one’s dissatisfaction with the responsibilities that the society ties an individual down with, opting to always be on the road avoiding commitment, therefore antagonizing themselves from the mainstream views of the post-world war II American society.
Among many attitudes revealed and formed by the American people of the post-World War II age, the most outstanding and significant one that stands out in On the Road is that which is carefree and action orientated. This train of thought is contrary to that of those Americans from before, who, unlike Sal, Dean, and so many others, believed in living a life consisting of conservatism and stability.
Many things took place towards the end of World War II, such as the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and a growing distrust of the Soviet Union. These events are among those that had the people of America thinking that their lives as they know it could end at any point in time thoughts that led to their carefree and action orientated lifestyles; after all, if in fact there are only few days left in one’s existence, doesn’t it make that much more sense to enjoy those times left on Earth and not worry about the future?
Having this Second World War behind them, Americans now had different worries pestering at their lives. For one thing, even though it was almost a decade behind them, memories and thoughts of the Great Depression still lingered in the minds of many Americans. Scared of...

... middle of paper ...

...e father and who was the son of antique life on earth, and made no comment” (Kerouac Road 280).
It seems that Sal changed from the beginning of the novel to the end, for both the better and the worse. He grew as a person and really found out who he was, but he did do some wrong things in order to get to that discovery. Ultimately, the novel is trying to tell us that our own identity is very personal and quite malleable. Every day that we live, we change a little bit and grow a little bit. Some morally dishonest acts may help to round out a flat and boring personality, but it is not absolutely necessary. In conclusion, the rhetoric appeal to character used in this novel is a very effective one because this sort of appeal helps to draw the audience into the book. It is up to the individual reader whether or not the characters are performing morally wrong acts or not.

Open Document