Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of Facebook on today's life
The effect of Facebook on today's life
Facebook threat to privacy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of Facebook on today's life
Terms and conditions may apply by Cullen Hoback (2013) is a documentary that makes people aware of the possible implications of posting online. The documentary discusses the problems with Facebook privacy and exposing information when using different social networks. Certain characters speak about how their information was used against them (Hoback 2013).
Hoback (2013) is a film that opens with an animation before adopting the conventional documentary style of live-action. It is a good example of how animation can tell a story about terms and conditions.
The animation compares the ‘real world’ with the ‘digital world’. The ‘real world’ is simple and straightforward with short terms and conditions, making it easy to follow (seen in Figure
…show more content…
The character gets agitated with all the advertising surrounding him. The terms and conditions are long and tedious; therefore the character does not bother reading them and just signs. As it is the digital world, this would pertain to a website or another digital platform. Therefore, the signature is easily duplicated and used across the entire continent of the US (symbolising people’s use of websites). All the people that the character has been in contact with (digitally) are analysed to a point where the FBI are suspicious of the character’s habits.
This animation is a good animation that generally addresses terms and conditions and how it has changed throughout the years with technology. The character goes through his own experience making the viewer relate to the visuals. Camera footage, doctors endorsing their medicine and services, dodgy and weird places to buy goods are many ways one can be influenced by terms and conditions. This shows terms and conditions need to be addressed in a more specific way. This gives the opportunity to use Facebook as the focus where multiple animations can be made for people to make sense of the ToS
…show more content…
This customised way of advertising can infringe on privacy. In Hoback’s (2013) documentary Terms and Condition may Apply a secretly pregnant female liked baby items and pages on Facebook. Not long afterwards targeted advertising suggested pages she may like. Family got suspicious which then forced her to tell them she was pregnant. She was not ready to tell them, but Facebooks’ targeted advertising told them for her.
Setting one’s Facebook account to ‘Public’ allows other Facebook users, who they are not ‘friends’ with, to view their profile. However, this setting also allows people who do not have Facebook to search them online.
4. When you publish content or information using the Public setting, it means that you are allowing everyone, including people off of Facebook, to access and use that information, and to associate it with you (i.e., your name and profile picture).
The compulsory ‘Public’ information, consisting of a Facebook user’s name and profile picture, is currently available for Facebook and non-Facebook users alike.
Understanding of
Joseph Turow’s The Daily You shows us the in depth look of behind the scenes of the advertising industry and its impact on individuals in the consumer society we live in. Every time you click a link, fill out a form or visit a website, advertisers are working to collect personal information about you, says Joseph Turow, a professor at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. Then they target ads to you based on that information they collected. This tracking is ubiquitous across the Internet, from search engines to online retailers and even greeting card companies.
Did you know that almost everything you do on the internet is being tracked and recorded in some way? In the Article, George Orwell… Meet Mark Zuckerberg, by Lori Andrews, Andrews talks about how behavioral advertising, which is the tracking of consumer’s online activities in order to bring custom-made advertisements, is a topic that is concealed to many people and can cause damage. Search engines like Google store the searches you have made and in 2006 there were search logs released which had personal information that people were judged by (Andrews 716-717). Data aggregation is the main way Facebook makes its money. Andrews believes that it’s an invasion of privacy and is not known well enough by the public. This article is aimed at young and new internet users that are ignorant of the possible dangers on the web. Lori Andrews is successful at informing novice users about the dangers of behavioral
Using the informal tone he enhances his argument by providing several thought-provoking statements that allow the reader to see the logic in the article, “Social media is designed for the information shared on it to be searched, and shared- and mined for profit… When considering what to share via social media, don 't think business vs. personal. Think public vs. private. And if something is truly private, do not share it on social media out of a misplaced faith in the expectation of privacy” (134). The reader should agree with Edmond that when posting or being a part of the social media bandwagon, you’re life and decisions will be up for display. Moreover, the business vs. personal and public vs. private point is accurate and logical, because evidently if you post something on any social media outlet you should expect that anyone and everyone can see it, regardless of your privacy settings. Edmond highlights that Facebook along with other social networking sites change their privacy settings whenever they please without
Facebook is Using You – claims that our information is being tracked and stored in large databases, which eventually are used either for our benefit or mostly for our disadvantage.
They can then use that knowledge to create ad campaigns customized to particular individuals” (541). This is a method companies use to get their products seen. For example, when one is researching for the latest weight loss product, when that individual goes on another web site, they will notice tons of ads about weight loss programs and products. Although this may seem like a great thing because these ads make the individual to research more about the products however, weblining can have a negative outcome. Andrews explained to readers that just because of your race, zip code and the web pages you visit you can: “You might be refused health insurance based on a Google search you did about a medical condition.
Scrolling through my Facebook feed on my iPhone, casually looking at my friend’s pictures statuses and updates, I came across a video with an amusing title. I tapped the play button expecting the video to load. Instead, I was redirected to an app asking permission to access my “public information, pictures and more.” I then realized; what I considered to be “private information” was not private anymore. Privacy is becoming slowly nonexistent, due to the invasion of advertising companies and the information we publicly post in the online world. In the essay “The Piracy of Privacy: Why Marketers Must Bare Our Souls” by Allen D. Kanner remarks, how major companies such as Google, Yahoo and Microsoft get billions of transmissions each year on
Privacy is all about limiting access to one’s self-image, behavior, information, etc., whereas property can be defined as ownership, and thus control over information and material goods. As James Grimmelmann explains, the design of social-network environments effectively impairs individual's ability to effectively evaluate their privacy risks. People rely heavily on larned actions to know what is safe and what is dangerous - Grimmelmann cites the age-old “Don’t talk to strangers” as one of these rules. (Grimmelmann, 2010, p. 8) He suggests that what Facebook is doing is, attempting to create the illusion of a setting where employing these rules and evaluating risks in that way is still possible.
Privacy and security is very important to have, especially if you are going to be on the Internet and sharing your information with others. Facebook lets the user have a choice to arrange your own privacy settings based on who can access your profile, posts, news feed, and messages. Facebook requires a username and profile picture to be accessible to everyone. Earlier, this was open to everyone and now due to updates on privacy settings, you can have the option of who can search you on Facebook.
... a future employer would perceive what they see. Protect your own right to privacy and limit what you allow to be public information. Reducing your friends list may help protect you, too. If you know a certain group of friends that are the weekend party people, then maybe they need to be just your friends and not your Facebook friends.
...stakes or putting something that might compromise you or anyone at one point. Even the fact that you put seemingly basic facts about you, such as the fact that you like a certain career, will influence how Facebook will show up for you. Ever wonder how you see ads on Facebook that have to do exactly with the things you have stated you liked on Facebook? That’s why. Facebook knows what you like and it uses that towards luring you into buying things or clicking on certain websites. Facebook is a mirror of yourself, a mirror that has always been highly priced because we value privacy and security more than anything, especially in the American culture. Alas, this valuable asset is lost in seconds, on any day and at any time, at the fingertips of external powers…
The issues caused by online privacy are growing with the increase of Social Networking Sites. Virtually all Social Networking Sites have ‘public’ as their default privacy setting, however that is not what the majority of users prefer. According to a survey by the Pew Research Center’s Internet Project & American Life, 80 % of the users go to the effort to change their settings to private. With the increasing awareness of cyber – crime and the need for privacy, users have now started to rethink their actions online. Carefully selecting whom among your Facebook friends see your personal information, and who should be restricted, blocked or unfriended.
The 21st century has brought a lot of modern ideas, innovations, and technology. One of these is social media. The invention of Facebook has completely changed the way we communicate with one another. Instant messaging, photo sharing, and joining online groups have created a way for families and friends to connect. Some argue that Facebook is the greatest invention however, while it is seemingly harmless, Facebook has created an invasion of privacy. The accessibility of Facebook and its widespread use has created privacy problems for users, teens, and interviewees by allowing easy control to viewers.
The growing popularity of information technologies has significantly altered our world, and in particular, the way people interact. Social networking websites are becoming one of the primary forms of communication used by people of all ages and backgrounds. No doubt, we have seen numerous benefits from the impact of social media communication: We can easily meet and stay in touch with people, promote ourselves, and readily find information. However, these changes prompt us to consider how our moral and political values can be threatened. One common fear among users is that their privacy will be violated on the web. In her book, Privacy in Context, Helen Nissenbaum suggests a framework for understanding privacy concerns online. She focuses particularly on monitoring and tracking, and how four “pivotal transformations” caused by technology can endanger the privacy of our personal information. One website that may pose such a threat is Facebook.
Keeping your privacy is getting harder and harder to do, but even though the privacy setting can help to an extent, they don’t always work the way they should. Putting information out for the public eye to see can be a risk but could also be used to the Facebook users advantage. With this comes a loss of privacy that the user has to deal with. No matter how many privacy settings are used or are changed they never a guaranty of full privacy. The only real way to guaranty this is to stay away from social media completely. With that we would lose the connected world we have today.
Facebook, twitter users endangering their right to privacy (2010, Jan 08). The Hindustan Times http://ezproxy.sbhu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/471264556?accountid=3783