Analysis Of Geoffrey Till's Adopting The Aircraft Carrier

1313 Words3 Pages

What Geoffrey Till was trying to portray in his article, “Adopting the Aircraft Carrier: The British, American, and Japanese case studies,” was that aircraft carriers possessed many important functions such as extended reconnaissance, shipping protection against enemy attack, and fire support. Although carriers proved themselves worthy during battle, Till argued that “in the years between the wars, the British, American, and Japanese navies failed to realize fully the contribution that airpower could make to the conduct of war at sea…by the outbreak of World War II, the three navies differed only in the degree of their underestimation of the strategic significance of maritime air power.” As a result of this underestimation of air carriers, …show more content…

Naval decision makers had issues on whether or not new technological developments were a good investment. Because of this hesitance on improving air power technology, the creation of aircraft carrier proved more difficult – this doubt had a direct bearing on the capabilities the British Navy needed to produce. Britain also had industrial declines and financial difficulties which directly resulted to the deficiencies in its carrier program. On the other hand, America and Japan had more specific incentives, thusly resulting in a better sense of direction of where they wanted to go and what they wanted to do with their carrier programs. Knowing what they wanted created an environment more favorable to …show more content…

The U.S. had no certain way to know how to position carriers when they were conducting operations. The strategy the U.S. utilized was aggressive and active attacks in order to hinder and harass the Japanese forces, but then the concern of keeping carriers separate when they were being attacked arose. It was quite difficult to maneuver multiple carriers together and coordinate flight operations from different carriers in a coherent force. It became obvious to the naval officers that a sound doctrine was urgently needed. After this realization, extensive experiments were conducted, and a new, sound doctrine was created, the PAC-10. The new doctrine was a success; it established the value of having combat information centers on every ship and the plan to incorporate carriers as a shield against Japanese attacks. A new fleet design was created that centered on carrier task forces. By the end of the war, it became clear that the innovation of the naval officers resulted in the creation of a modern, combined arms fleet. What is amazing is that before 1944, there were barely enough carrier aircraft available for naval officers to become proficient at planning air tactics. By 1944, the fleet’s air force was ready for “carrier

More about Analysis Of Geoffrey Till's Adopting The Aircraft Carrier

Open Document