Analysis Of Fortinbras In Shakespeare's Hamlet

966 Words2 Pages

Shakespeare’s Hamlet depicts an internal struggle in which Hamlet must battle his cowardice to do what is right for his father, his mother, and Denmark. The play shows Hamlet attempting to avenge his father’s, King Hamlet, death. The ghost of King Hamlet returns to speak with Hamlet regarding the matter. Unlike what the country has been told, his father informs Hamlet that he had in fact been murdered by Claudius, Hamlet’s uncle who had taken the throne. King Hamlet assigns his son with the task of killing Claudius and retaking the throne of Denmark. It is at this point in the play that Hamlet truly begins to display his cowardice. He does not act in many situations in which he is given the opportunity to kill Claudius. Rather than embarking upon a murderous rampage, Hamlet decides to act as though he has gone insane to fool the rest of the court, eventually with the result being the …show more content…

Possible reasons for this include the fact that it is a very short scene, or that it is one that furthers the double plot of Fortinbras and the director would rather focus strictly on the work’s direct plot of Hamlet avenging his father’s death. Within the play, Fortinbras acts as a double to that of Hamlet, much like Neville Longbottom would to Harry Potter. Fortinbras’s father, also named Fortinbras was killed and the Prince is now faced with the task of reunifying Norway and taking back what is believed to be rightful his. This is why the Norwegian army is attempting to invade Poland, to win back honor and dignity. Thus making him almost a mirror of Hamlet. Many directors exclude this scene solely for the fact that it could be confusing to the average viewer, and cause them to become disinterested. Many professionals and scholars consider this to be a disservice to the audience, as this scene truly encompasses the Hamlet’s epiphany and marks the downfall of

Open Document