Analysis Of El Contrato

802 Words2 Pages

The documentary El Contrato follows the exploits of Mexican migrant workers as they find themselves being exploited. In particular, it follows one man, Teodoro Martinez, a father of 4 who has worked many seasons in Canada. Teodoro returns year after year. He does not return because he enjoys it, he returns for the pay. The migrant workers are chosen with certain criteria in mind. These ‘desirable’ traits are that they have minimal, if any, education and a family in Mexico. The workers chosen are typically quite poor, many not owning a house. The pay is better than what they could get in Mexico, so they must make the decision to desert their families for two thirds of the year to support their loved ones. They are brought to a town where most …show more content…

Ten workers are assigned to a house that might otherwise accommodate a family of three or four. Furthermore, the houses are furnished to the bare minimum. Chairs are at a premium. You would be lucky to have a couple in the eating area. The abysmal living conditions are the least of the workers’ worries though. The conditions at work are even worse. There is no safety training, no instruction, no refusal of unsafe labour. There is a doctor, but they must obtain permission before they can be seen. Permission with which the grower is not very generous. This leads illnesses and injuries which should be negligible to scale into something extreme. There is also the possibility that the grower will send them back to Mexico if they get sick, robbing them of the ability to make the money they need to sustain their families. When told to do something, they are expected to get it done quickly and without question. Such a situation leads to managers with power complexes, managers that will get verbally and physically abusive if they believe their power is being subverted. In the hypothetical situation that one of the workers is assaulted, they have minimal recourse. If they have no witnesses, they would have to accuse the manager on their own. Such an accusation would most likely be swept aside, but not without consequences to the worker. The manager could begin to target the worker, making their life difficult. The worker might even be sent …show more content…

The answer is that there simply is no recourse for them. It is illegal for them to form a union. Their right to association does not exist. This leaves them with few choices. They can discuss the problem with the company, although the company is often the root of the problem to begin with, or they can go to the Mexican Consulate. The issue there is that the Consulate is not there to look out for their citizens. The Consulate only cares about the contract, and the money they make from filling it. The workers cannot even threaten to quit, for they are constantly reminded that there would just be an eager Mexican next in line, waiting to fill this position. Should a problem arise between a worker and a manager, the worker can request to change farms. This request must be approved by both farms. For the farm they are leaving, the manager may prove spiteful and refuse to sign off. For the farm they are looking to change to, the manager may view the worker as problematc and refuse. Beyond that, if a worker moves farm near the end of the season, the new farm has the option of not paying for their plane ticket home. The workers are looking to spend as little of that money as possible, for they are already losing a share of it to the Canadian government. The workers are required to pay taxes and Employment Insurance, yet receive little to none of the benefits derived

Open Document