More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of the industrial revolution in america
Impacts of the industrial revolution in america
Positive and negative impacts of migration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Boom, Bust, Exodus” was drastically different than the other immigration books I have read. The author, Chad Broughton was draw to stories that showed industrial capitalism, globalization and economic issues in an economic yet personal way. The book depicts the economic and public history of two very different cities; Galesburg in Illinois and Reynosa at the Mexican border. The connection of these two cities is that Maytag’s primary manufacturing plant was shut down in Galesburg to be moved to Reynosa. This move was done for purely economic reasons but had tremendous positive and negative effects on both city’s economy and community. “Boom, Bust, Exodus” highlights a different side of immigration; where companies outsource their labor and …show more content…
Once the war ended, soldiers returned home to find a prosperous economy with innovations and jobs. Sub-sequentially, in 1950 and 1960, the commodity industry was booming and citizens had disposable money to spend (Broughton 27). Manufacturing towns such as Galesburg saw immense prosperity. In ten years leading up to 1974, manufacturing jobs increased by 62% in 1974 and the area was quickly coined Appliance City (Broughton 33). However the economy started to shift and these companies needed to find ways to cut their costs and remain competitive to make a profit. For the decision makers in these firms, “everything boiled down to economics… what can a company do to reduce or minimize their costs” (Broughton 82). Instead of attracting cheaper labor, Maytag and other manufacturing companies relocated their plants in less developed companies, such as Mexico. This environment provided cheaper resources of all kinds. Maytag closed its Galesburg facility to open one in Reynosa Mexico and several other companies did the same. From 1998 to 2003, the United States lost three million manufacturing jobs (Broughton 64). This drastically killed American towns that were reliant on these jobs. Towns such as Galesburg lost their jobs and became a ghost …show more content…
Under this development, foreign companies could set up plants within 100 miles of the United States/Mexico border. These were known as maquiladoras (Broughton 5). Maytag and other manufacturing companies took advantage of this opportunity for the cheap labor, land, resources and thus ability to be more profitable. Maquiladora employment tripled to 1.3 million in 2001, since 1990 (Broughton 142). Maytag’s plant was called Planta III and required less jobs and less skilled labor than what was required in Galesburg. This was good for the company’s bottom line, but bad for employees. The employers had complete control since labor was so easily replaceable. The workers began to be looked at as machines; interchangeable and dispensable and thus were not getting a fair wage. In Mexico the average cost for one week of food was $81 but maquiladora employees would only get paid $36 per week (Broughton 152). Maquiladoras also hurt the local and national Mexican economies. Locals would say that “the only thing maquiladoras have done is occupy the workforce … they don’t resolve any of the problems they generate…overpopulation, lack of social services, school and health care. All of this is what the maquiladoras have brought” (Broughton 153). These companies were simply there to make a profit and provide jobs, not to enrich the employee’s or communities lives. The profits from
In the late nineteenth century, many European immigrants traveled to the United States in search of a better life and good fortune. The unskilled industries of the Eastern United States eagerly employed these men who were willing to work long hours for low wages just to earn their food and board. Among the most heavily recruiting industries were the railroads and the steel mills of Western Pennsylvania. Particularly in the steel mills, the working conditions for these immigrants were very dangerous. Many men lost their lives to these giant steel-making machines. The immigrants suffered the most and also worked the most hours for the least amount of money. Living conditions were also poor, and often these immigrants would barely have enough money and time to do anything but work, eat, and sleep. There was also a continuous struggle between the workers and the owners of the mills, the capitalists. The capitalists were a very small, elite group of rich men who held most of the wealth in their industries. Strikes broke out often, some ending in violence and death. Many workers had no political freedom or even a voice in the company that employed them. However, through all of these hardships, the immigrants continued their struggle for a better life.
In the first chapters, Castaneda uses several testimonials to explain how Mexican immigration patterns developed drastically in the 1990’s. Castaneda made a point to emphasize the seasonality issue from which he created the second part of the title: “From Migrants to Immigrants.” He speaks about the reduction in immigrants returning to Mexico because of the much stricter guidelines on border control. This also has made the Mexican immigrants in the United States, legal or illegally, drastically grow. There are about “11 million in 2007 and an estimated 6.2 million are
The trip to one of the maquiladoras was informative. It was clean and well organized. In appearance it was no different than many of the assembly line production companies in the US. What was markedly different was the wage. Our tour guide hesitantly told us the wage was approximately eight US dollars a day. When comparing eight dollars a day to the eight dollars an hour paid by assembly lines in the US it is easy to see why people would be inclined to immigrate to the US in search of a higher wage.
Many new industries were developed to support mass production of goods, such as, roads, tires, and all the items it took to build a vehicle for the automobiles.(David Shannon, 217) The chemical industry grew in the United States after First World War because America couldn't get the chemical anymore they had gotten from Germany. (Shannon, 219) Americans wanted the access to electric power which included: lights, radios, and washing machines. There was a mass movement of people from the country to the city looking for jobs. The rural life couldn't support a family like urban living could, people left the farming industry and moved to the manufacturing industries which damage the ability for agricultural to survive.(Shannon, 219) The effects of prosperity revolved around the automobile specifically younger people's ability to escape adult supervision.
Very high population rates do not correspond with working labor force, in that (Polaski 2004) the Mexican labor force grew from 32.3 million immediately before NAFTA to 40.2 million in 2002, meaning that Mexico needed almost a million jobs a year simply to absorb the growth in labor supply. Many theorists suggest that a free trade zone will increase employment, by the increase demand for labor therefore creating a vast rapid workforce. However, NAFTA has greatly impacted manufacturing employment, by producing a low small net gain in hobs in Mexico, in that jobs created in export manufacturing have barely kept pace with jobs lost in agriculture due to imports (Polaski 2004). There has been a visible weakening in domestic manufacturing employment, related in part to increase import competition. In addition, the cause of a decline in domestic manufacturing employment is caused due to the relocation of the maquiladora factory workforce, which the United States has relocated the maquiladora assembly plants to China and Indonesia, because of low wage, cheaper labor workforce, skilled workforce, and less environmental protection laws. The maquiladora assembly plants in the late 20th century have disappeared
The purpose of the Maquiladora Program formation was to create jobs in northern Mexico. Unemployment was shockingly high in Mexico during the mid-1900s due to environmental and other economic factors. In order to lower the rate of unemployment, Mexico and the U.S. joined together and birthed the idea of the maquiladora, a seemingly mutualistic solution to the problem for both Mexico and
Stanley, George E. "The Rise Of Manufacturing." The Era of Reconstruction and Expansion (1865-1900. N.p.: World Almanac Library, 2005. 20-21. Google Books. World Almanac Library. Web. 29 Sept. 2013.
At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Pittsburgh became a leader in America’s industrial production. This industrial production dominated Pittsburgh’s economy for over a century. This attracted many foreigners to Pittsburgh which had a demand for unskilled workers. However, Pittsburgh eventually lost its position as one of the world’s largest industrial producers and became a rising city for businesses in the field of information technology. As a result, Pittsburgh shifted from a city of mostly blue-collar workers to a city of mostly white-collar workers.
During the 1900’s through 1950’s the United States experienced an influx of immigrants coming in from Mexico seeking employment opportunities, as many of them wanted to avoid the Mexican Revolution occurring from 1910 to 1920. Methods for arriving in the United States varied for each individual’s preference of the destination, but the means of transportation had been constant throughout. These methods of transportation consisted of contractors seeking unskilled workers willing to partake in hard labor in steel, railroad, or agriculture companies. Contractors traveled to towns close to Mexico’s boarder such as Laredo or El Paso seeking Mexicans citizens for labors. In some instances, immigrants traveled on their own will based on the advice
It did not matter if a laborer lost a finger, the only thing that mattered to the businessmen was making more money. This was how life was working in the factory and it shows that the industries are taking advantage of the immigrants and forcing the less fortunate to work in deplorable circumstances.
The Industrial Revolution in America began to develop in the mid-eighteen hundreds after the Civil War. Prior to this industrial growth the work force was mainly based in agriculture, especially in the South (“Industrial Revolution”). The advancement in machinery and manufacturing on a large scale changed the structure of the work force. Families began to leave the farm and relocate to larger settings to work in the ever-growing industries. One area that saw a major change in the work force was textile manufacturing. Towns in the early nineteen hundreds were established around mills, and workers were subjected to strenuous working conditions. It would take decades before these issues were addressed. Until then, people worked and struggled for a life for themselves and their families. While conditions were harsh in the textile industry, it was the sense of community that sustained life in the mill villages.
Aside from national security interests domestic thirst for oil boomed. The war brought us out of the Great Depression. During the Depression a traditionally capitalist American society embraced a kind of socialism with the New Deal. WWII transformed the bear turned in a raging bull. Capitalism was back with a vengeance, charging forward stronger than it had ever been before. The heavy industry built up to sustain the war effort was retooled to meet the demands of the emerging consumerist culture of the 1950s. The new explosion of industrial output became so pervasive that the decade ended with President Eisenhower warning of the dangers of the growing “Military-Industrial Complex.”
The start of this decade was an economic boom. With the war over and done, people were happy and rich. This did not last long. By the end of the century the Great Depression would begin.
In document 4, a chart is shown of the U.S unemployment rates from 1926-1945. This chart shows how as farmer unemployment got worse, so did the non-farmers. In the 1920’s workers who worked in the city had more opportunities to find jobs unlike farmers who kept a more basic, traditional lifestyle. If farmers who produce food for factories couldn’t anymore, that meant workers would be laid off in the city and factories would shut down forever.
After WWII, the industrial revolution began to decline and economic focus was being shifted from manufacturing to service. Deindustrializatio...