An Analysis Of 'The Danger Of A Single Story'

708 Words2 Pages

The Maldives, Rome, Paris, New York City, Buenos Aires, Venice; don't they all sound like magical places whose cultures and histories put us in awe? Well, there are many other great places in the world not yet labeled as “incredible tourist-attractions” due to several reasons such as failed infrastructures or the absence of five-star hotels. The speaker, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie gave a speech, “The Danger of a Single Story”, addressing the problem of stereotyping places, people, their cultures, and believing that there is beauty in certain aspects only and not others. She talks about how people tend to be narrow-minded about specific topics and judge based on how information is portrayed to them by the local news channel, by magazines, or by social media. As the famous saying goes: “There are always two sides of a story”. Consequently, I believe it is not entirely correct that what is shown to a person, is what actually defines something or someone, and it is dangerous to believe that one detail displays the importance of a specific person or country. …show more content…

Mere publicity of a particular place is never enough, especially through social media. It is true that there is perhaps some accuracy in what is portrayed by social media, but it is also true that people twist news, focus only on one bad aspect of it, and turn it into gossip for publicity and money. This could lead to loss of trust, where that news source is never trusted again; which also leads to loss of business. It may also lead to loss of money as they might lose tourists. If Shamsa’s brother did not show the beautiful parts of the state, I would have never thought of visiting that state due to how awfully Shamsa displayed it. I would have missed out on a great future opportunity to see the beauty of it with my own two

Open Document