American Fundamentalism

1247 Words3 Pages

Fundamentalism and American Culture by George Marsden provoked new insights and challenged existing assumptions of fundamentalism within America. Through Marsden’s critical analysis of fundamentalist roots which assess the contextual religious, social, and intellectual developments within early American culture, one can see a complex movement that has deeply ingrained itself within the overall American fiber. Due the movement’s perspicacious leadership which challenged American social norms through a variety of avenues and in highlighting particular branches of the fundamentalist movement, Marsden provides a deepened insight which helps preclude previous caricature assumptions one my have on fundamentalism within America.
Marsden’s analysis denotes the development of fundamentalism to particular intellectual progressions, particularly within the evangelical revivalism which took place within the late eighteenth to early nineteenth century (Marsden pg 11-12). After the civil war, Marsden elaborates on the consanguinity between evangelicals faith, morality, society, scripture, and science. However due to the introduction of Darwinian evolution, which was a major determinant within the fundamentalist movement, brought significant breaks within the evangelical body. Marsden points to two major theologians, Charles Hodge and James McCosh as representatives of these divisions. Charles Hodge, which represents the conservative position, could not reconcile the naturalism that was present within Darwinism (Marsden pg 19). As for McCosh, science and scripture correlate and verify one another, “Both reveal order in the world, the one appointed by God; the other discovered by man” (Marsden pg 19). The latter along with the cultural developm...

... middle of paper ...

...ered a depth of understanding of the progression of the fundamentalist movement, and through that have come to better appreciate its impact on American culture. I have also obtained a better outlook on how the movement’s leaders interpreted and responded to their context which lead to further developments of fundamentalism. Previous assumptions of this movement have been reevaluated and adjusted from a flat narcissistic view of militarism fundamentalism to one that seeings the complex nuances within the overall movement. I appreciated the comprehensive analysis that included both the intellectual and social forces which made the whole movement comprehendible to the reader. One can see clearly where the antebellum period, Baconism, Common Sense realism, Premillennialism, Pietism, and many other influences contributed to the fundamentalist view within American society.

Open Document