Allegory In Lord Of The Flies

1710 Words4 Pages

Misfortune strikes immediately. Ralph, stranded on an island along with a group of fellow British school boys, finds himself with little hope for rescue and the onerous task of leadership. It is he who discovers the conch and calls the boys to assembly. It is he who must navigate them through this disaster. Ralph feels the weight of the world falling squarely upon his young, and seemingly inadequate, shoulders. He finds that he is not up to the test. Despite his efforts, order, control, and civilized behavior quickly flee the island as the boys descend into an animal-like existence punctuated by inane acts of violence. His calls for the restoration of rationality and peace are rebuffed, as the boys plunge into evil and murder. Ralph is left …show more content…

First, it is important to consider the circumstances of Golding’s work. He wrote on the heels of a clear and poignant demonstration of human evil. Therefore, with the events of the Second World War and the emerging Cold War in mind, Golding viewed Lord of the Flies as a necessary warning to the world of its erroneous behavior. In his essay, Good Grief: Lord of the Flies as a Post-war Rewriting of Salvation History, critic Marijke van Vuuren explains Golding’s perception of his own work: “Golding once referred to himself as a ‘pint-sized Jeremiah’. Jeremiah's [voice] was a fierce, passionate voice to an unbelieving generation. But perhaps more significantly, he is the writer of Lamentations, a cry wrung from the heart at the suffering of his people” (van Vuuren 1). While Jeremiah was a biblical prophet who lived thousands of years before Golding’s time, the comparison to Golding is apt. Jeremiah saw the evil. Having seen the sin that permeated Israelite society, Jeremiah sought to be a “passionate voice to an unbelieving generation” in his calls for a return to God through repentance. Likewise, Golding, having seen the violence perpetrated by the nations of Europe during his time as a sailor in the British Navy, cries out out for “the suffering of his people.” He, just as Jeremiah, “hear[s] the whispering of many” and comes to the conclusion that “Terror is all around!" …show more content…

The critic David Spitz writes in his essay entitled “Power and Authority: An Interpretation of William Golding’s Lord of the Flies”, “[....][The island] was, if you will, a state of nature inhabited by free and equal individuals. If anything were to go wrong, as it tragically did, it could only come, then, from within; the only enemy of man was himself” (Spitz 191). Here, Spitz explicates how Golding sets up events on the island to forcefully assert his message regarding human fallibility. Golding eliminates a plethora of factors that traditionally affect human behavior to leave the island in “a state of nature inhabited by free and equal individuals.” Golding removes the boys from ‘civilized’ society and injects them to a remote island, a beautiful and Edenesque paradise abounding with food, water, and shelter; thereby separating them from the material worries. Moreover, Golding uses young children of the same gender to remove the influence of conventional sexual motivations. Even further, he strips away distinctions of class, social status, and inequality. It is here, in a veritable utopia without traditional societal pressures, that the boys reveal their own inner evil. Spitz reveals Golding’s careful crafting of a microcosm for the outside civilization as a

Open Document