All Quiet On The Western Front Rhetorical Analysis

387 Words1 Page

Erich Maria Remarque wrote the perspective of Paul Baumer, a German who was the supposed “enemy” in World War I. However, Remarque humanizes the opposing side, as he reminds the audience that soldiers are average humans too; not murderers. His motive for writing All Quiet on the Western Front is to describe the gap between paradise and war; emphasizing the horrors of war, the alarming transformation from men to animal in combat, and the collapse of young men in the following generation. While Deterring, Kat, and Paul are suddenly swept with a sneak attack, the men quickly take shelter to escape being harmed. Faintly, they hear a noise that appear to be the cries of “wounded horses”...The men cannot stand the wailing as “it is the moaning of the world, it is the martyred creation, wild with anguish, filled with terror, and groaning...We are pale” (62). In a civilized society, the sorrow and wretchedness of an animal is unquestionably distressing for a human; nonetheless the soldiers encounter these experiences in their day to day lives, and eventually grow accustomed to. Himmelstoss emerges as he tells the soldiers that he is the head-cook. Paul pays attention to the substantial amounts of food in the cook-house he feels satisfied as the soldiers “momentarily have the two good things a soldier needs for contentment”(138). …show more content…

Baumer is merely anticipating the nourishment he will receive; he cannot dive into intellectual or philosophical thoughts, which implies he is slowly becoming animalistic and distancing himself from

Open Document