All Advertising Should Be Banned

1909 Words4 Pages

All Advertising Should Be Banned

A man on the point of death is shown lying on a bed, Aids has taken

such a grip on him that he will never return from his state of

unconsciousness; is this advertising or exploitation? Another man,

half naked, with a Kalashnikov in one hand and a femur bone in the

other is used to sell jumpers to the worldwide public; is this again

exploitation or just effective advertising? Both of these are,

however, effective if a person remembers this company’s name, United

Colours of Benetton, but at the same time it can be argued are

exploitation. Whether for a good or ghoulish reason the company has

used successful advertising. This is a widely debated area: where to

draw the line in advertising or whether to ban it all. The

advertisements that subliminally penetrate our minds everyday through

magazines, television, billboards and posters are rapidly increasing.

Every company wants a slice of the advertising world. From chocolate

to washing machines, from hats to the latest happy meal at Mc

Donald’s, the average person is exposed to one thousand three hundred

advertisements a day whether they may realise this or not.

The word advertisement comes from the Latin “Adverto” which means to

turn; advertisements are made to turn people or persuade people into

buying a way of thinking, a product or a service. This is what

advertising is meant for but with the money to be made there are often

ulterior motives at work. This is when it is no longer harmless; the

advertisers will stop at nothing to achieve their aims, they exploit

people so that the product is remembered for all the wrong reasons.

Is it ...

... middle of paper ...

...sk-free life and what is life if there is no risk? Sexist or

racist advertisements should be banned but the problem is where to

draw the line; is it allowed if the sexist remark or racist comment

was meant as a joke? The ASA should make sure their policy has strict

guidelines and that the advertisements designed to shock should only

be for charities or in the interest of the public. The advertisements

that stir up controversy should be for a good reason; these

advertisements will stay in a person’s mind for an extraordinary

length of time hence they should benefit the public in some way.

Everyone has the right to know about the world and what is going on in

it; advertising does just this. In conclusion advertising should not

be banned, only monitored to ensure that the truth prevails and the

public are not misled.

Open Document