Against The Odds, And Against The Common Good Analysis

615 Words2 Pages

Imagine a world where the proceeds from the state-run lottery goes to pay for multiple student's college educations. According to Gloria Jiménez, Tufts University student, state-run lotteries purposely appeal to the poor to buy lottery tickets to fund education and other important services state-wide. In her article, "Against the Odds, and Against the Common Good," Jiménez maintains that the states and their lottery urge people to gamble away their hard-earned money. The lottery inspires false hope of winning a big jackpot, where their odds of winning are "one in several million," hence the "Against the Odds" part of the title. Jiménez insists that the state should not be urging people to gamble, therefore should not be a part of the lottery. Considering the fact that thirty-nine states and Washington D.C. all have state-run lotteries, many others do not feel the same as her. Despite the author giving evidence on why the state lotteries are a good thing, she disputes almost all …show more content…

State-run lotteries open up many opportunities for the poor and for students combined. Not only that, but they also help many government run resources like social services. If the state was not using the lottery to fund these projects, the state government would have to raise the state taxes in order to receive the money needed. The author points out that because these programs are so important to the government, they should not rely so heavily on the poor and addicted (to gambling) to fund these projects. Money earned from lottery tickets is used to pay for many student's scholarships. Despite what the author says, the states are taking great advantage over the lottery system that for the most part, benefits almost all of their citizens. The lottery has prevented already high taxes from being raised more. The article points out that the state legislatures have basically made the whole lottery ticket system into a "voluntary

Open Document