Advertising During The Renaissance

1994 Words4 Pages

While some people may claim to consider advertising a type of fine art, they seldom actually treat advertisements as such. One would be hard-pressed to find, for example, people at an upscale cocktail party who would rather talk about magazine ads than about Picassos, and while numerous homes have paintings hung over their mantles, I have yet to encounter a homeowner who frames advertisements, however well-done, in his or her living room. Even advertising executives shy away from the thought of calling their works “fine art,” with one advertiser stating in the trade magazine Adweek that he becomes “annoyed when people call [advertising] art […] it’s a very dopey notion to me, [as] you’re there to sell ideas or products” (Melillo). Of course, …show more content…

Those whom we now call the era’s greatest artists did not actually view themselves as artists – instead, they often referred to themselves as craftsmen or artisans with a practical purpose, not unlike the graphic designers responsible for creating the advertisements of today (Galenson 3). As craftsmen, these talented individuals worked to attract the patronage of powerful people, who commissioned works demonstrating their superiority and opulence. Michelangelo and his peers, for instance, created a “repertory of images that communicated Medici power and dynastic rule, [and the Medici’s ability to pay for these expensive images suggests…] the marvelous bounty enjoyed by Florence under Cosimo [Medici’s] rule” (“Exhibition Themes”). One can draw a myriad of parallels between Renaissance art and modern advertising: Renaissance dynastic families, for instance, mirrored modern multinational corporations; craftsmen served the role of today’s advertising agencies; and instead of pushing a good or service, the “advertisements” of the Renaissance sought to convince subjects of a ruler’s political legitimacy. Even the contracts negotiated between Renaissance artisans and their patrons share similarities to contracts between modern corporations and their associated advertising agencies. Indeed, historian Michelle O’Malley reveals in her book The …show more content…

Acquired from natives in Sumba, Indonesia sometime during the 19th century, this ladle exemplifies so-called primitive art. People unaware of this ladle’s past would likely use it for its intended purpose – as a utensil to serve soup – but people who have seen the ladle at a museum would balk at performing such a sacrilegious action. These opposing reactions stem from the different ways the ladle is presented in each scenario. In the first scenario, we would find the ladle in the dishwasher or a pot of stew, but in the second, we would find it in a museum, a place which Carol Duncan deems a center for cultural rituals that “provide a frame and create a mood receptive to fantastic tales” (11). In this case, the museum certainly provides a frame and a tale for the ladle – by putting the ladle in an enclosed pedestal surrounded by bright lights, an airy atmosphere, and an ever-watchful security guard, the museum subconsciously gives the object a mysticism, inducing audiences to view its past users as some strange alien species with a fascinating culture. Context matters in our perceptions of many other works of “art” as well. In an introduction of his book Why Africa? Why Art?, Kwarme Appiah explains why Europeans may sometimes wonder how Asante weights, otherwise beautifully carved, have “limb[s]

Open Document