The concept of local control is based on a philosophy built on the notion that individuals and institutions nearest to the students with much knowledge about a school. Most invested in the welfare and success of its educators, students, and communities who are well placed in making decisions about its operation, leadership, staffing, academics, and development ("Local Control Definition"). This philosophy of governance is often contrasted with state or federal policies that intend to influence the structure and operation given that the control offered to local governing bodies is directly related to the level of prescription articulated in educational laws, and related compliance rules and requirements ("Local Control Definition").
There are some arguments that are in support of local control. Local control increases local pride, civic participation, and encourages the public s financial support for public schools this is because active participation in the governing strategy increases the sense of togetherness and ownership thus locally managed schools benefits from the great community involvement and investment.
…show more content…
Its objective is promotion of an orderly pattern of development and separation of incompatible land uses, such as industrial uses and homes, to ensure a pleasant environment (Zoning 71). The zoning resolution is a legal instrument to regulate and establish limits on the use of land and building size, shape, and height. Under the policy power rights local control philosophy is enhanced in zoning where state governments can exercise power over private real property. With this power special laws and regulations were long made restricting where particular types of business can be carried on. In 1916, New York City adopted the first zoning regulations to apply city-wide as a reaction to the equitable building which towered over the adjacent residences, diminishing the availability of sunshine ("About
Local school boards must know and completely understand the basis of legal responsibilities and restrictions. These responsibilities and restriction include overseeing the operation of local public schools. The school board is held accountable for creation of policies, rules and regulations that provides guidance for the administration and operation of schools. The school board is perceived as a corporate body, which means an individual member of the board do not have more power than the overall power that is given to the board by the legislature. Therefore, individual school board members do not have the freedom to formulate policy, or act self-sufficiently of the school board as a whole. School board members are known to be public school officers, and are given powers by the legislature that help them fulfill their responsibilities.
Baldridge, J.V., Curtis, D.V., Ecker, G.P., & Riley, G.L. (1977). Alternative models of governance in higher education. In G.L. Riley and J.V. Baldridge. Governing academic organization. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
Arguments For: Allows individuals or groups with innovative educational ideas to put them into practice without being unduly hampered by local or state bureaucracy. These schools may have unconventional hours, experiment with curricula, specialize in certain types of teaching or design programs tailored to a particular audience or community. Charter schools can introduce the ingredient of a measure of needed competition to the public schools. They may provide for more accountability because schools that work will be rewarded and those that do not will be changed or even closed.
Building bye-laws: Local authority control of building standards promulgated to regulate and control the usage of property and areas in cities and town.
These regulations are set forth by the New York Department of City Planning for the following reasons: decrease property values of surrounding business and residents, increase in crime, substantial loss of business because of loss in investments and decline in economic and pedestrian activities.
the schools in that particular state, decides from where the school’s will get their money, regulates the licensing of teachers, and also decides on a minimum required amount of days that children need to be in school. Each school district also has a school board, who helps with all the major decisions within the school district. The members of these boards are elected in, and usually serve for a few years.
The opposition claims that there are many advantages to public education as opposed to private or vocational education. Some people suggest, “Public schools generally have a range of children from the whole gamut of socioeconomic clas...
educational policy NCLB and overseen by the U.S. Department of Education, the Tenth Amendment gives the state the autonomy to oversee its own educational system. Thanks to the power given to each state by the Tenth Amendment each state has its own standards and curriculum to which it has students adhere to ensure that they have a mastery of certain educational skills, in order for that to be possible there have to be “50 departments of education, overseeing some 16,000 school districts that serve 52 million students in more than 10,000 schools” (Eisner, 2001,
The laws of the schools are to protect the students, faculty, and staff. Administrators must know the law so that everyone is treated equally and fair. With the state statutes, the school boards have the right to adopt and enforce rules and regulations necessary to operate and manage schools. Parents have to right to place their children in any institutions they feel their children will excel, whether that is a private or public school.(Essex, 2002, p. 6)
I think the only responsibilty of the change agents are to inform the public of their choices. Let the public know what is out there, and what the benefits are to school choice. Most people are going to wonder why they should take the trouble to transport their children to a school that might be a little farther than the school in the neighborhood. I believe that it is also very important to give many choices. I think it would be a mistake to limit the students to certain schools.
With the passage of NCLB, many school reform efforts have been initiated using top-down model in which each school leaders have been charged with initiating bold administrative changes to address the legislation. With the number of leadership theories and models, researchers have become interested in studying those to determine which might bring forth the most significant results for leading such change. Due to the lack of highly qualified administrators and the increasing demands for administrators, Bush, O’Brien & Spangler (2005) studied a program, the Southern Tier Leadership Academy, a collaborative of the New York Education Department. The study included three separate cohorts who completed an eight month program. Whereas, Somech (2005) chose to investigate directive and participative leadership approaches, and which would more significantly impact school effectiveness. Perhaps Somech’s reflect Scherer’s (2009, p.7) understandings as described in Educational Leadership, ‘broom-wielding leadership can indeed be beneficial’ as is putting advocates into positions of power and influence and building teams, both of which are seemingly contrasting opposites.
Students are expected to become well educated, self-thinking, and creative citizens. When teachers are expected to teach to a state guided curriculum students are limited to the standards and content of knowledge. Students are all given the same multiple choice test, on the same day, at the same time. Students are not given a chance to show their depth of knowledge.
While the schools and the school districts play a major role in school security, both the State and Federal governments have their own roles to fulfill in school security. However, their roles differ from not only the school districts, but also from themselves. Furthermore, if the governments are able to fulfill their roles, then the schools can as well; a win-win situation.
Growing up around kids who have only been home schooled and hasn’t ever been to a public school before, I have noticed glaring problems. When socializing with others, they struggle, and need their parents to ask questions for them. They don’t have a set of standards, and get taught what their parents want to teach. They don’t have extracurricular activities that mold them for the future. When it comes to structure there isn’t any, they do what they want when they want. Their parents aren’t teachers, and just teach them what they want to teach them. Finally they don’t get certain benefits offered by all public schools. All these reasons and many more, is why I think Public schooling can be a better educational system than homeschooling.
There are many decisions for parents to choose private or public school for their kids. Every parent wants what is best for his or her child. A person's education is one of the most important aspects in determining whether or not they will become a productive member of society. Education is so important. We need to look at both public and private schools to find out if there is a difference. Private schools are a better choice than public school for many reasons. Private encourages strong quality teaching, encourages higher education learning, and inhibit the rampant of bullying.