Utilitarianism is a moral theory that expresses the view that human well-being is the only good. When determining which action to take utilitarians desire to know which action will produce the greater overall human well-being. Utilitarians believe that everyone’s well-being is of equal value. A utilitarian’s own well-being is considered just as important, no more or less, than everyone else’s well-being. When considering what action to make for the benefit or everyone’s well-being, a utilitarian must first consider their audience. The audience of an action is everyone whose well-being may be increased or decreased by the action. Each member of the audience carries just as much importance as the next and all of the members should be considered as equals (Harris). Utilitarians believe it is best to seek the “greatest total utility” (Harris ). Utility has been defined …show more content…
Act utilitarianism “judges the morality of an action by whether the action itself produces the most utility, or at least as much utility as any other action” (Harris ). While rule utilitarianism “judges the morality of an action by whether the moral rule presupposed by the action, if generally followed, would produce the most utility, or at least as much utility as any other rule” (Harris). In applying act utilitarianism to Officer Jankowski’s situation the two reasonable options available are charging Samantha with a DUI or letting her off with a warning. The audience in this particular scenario includes Samantha, Officer Jankowski, the police department, Judge Robertson, Samantha’s mother and younger brother as well as all of the other drivers on the road that Samantha may encounter while driving her vehicle. The two options must be weighed by considering how every person in the audience would be affected
In Utilitarianism For and Against by Bernard Williams, Williams has an argument that is based on the value of integrity. Integrity is defined as the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles or moral uprightness. In Williams argument he believes in certain circumstances utilitarianism requires agents to abandon their personal projects and commitments. This lead Williams to claim that utilitarianism is an attack on an agent’s integrity. In my essay I will explain Williams’s argument on utilitarianism and how he is lead to believe it is an attack on an agent’s integrity. I will also explain why he thinks it can force us to abandon our personal projects. Within my essay I will also explain the theory of right conduct explained by Timmons in the book Moral Theory. I will also explain the notions of personal responsibility explained by Williams, as well as the notion of personal projects and commitments and the notion of integrity.
Additionally, there are two types of Utilitarianism that need to be considered when applying the tradition to a real world situation. The first type is act utilitarianism. Here, an act is judged to be utilitarian in nature if it produces the most amount of satisfaction at the time (such as equal division of a pie among friends). The other type of utilitarianism is rule utilitarianism. In rule utilitarianism, the rules that are utilitarian in nature – designed with the intention to maximize satisfaction – are ultimately what are desired. It is important to note that in rule utilitarianism, an action guided by utilitarian principles that...
One constant between all cultures is the understanding that all lives will come to an end. Throughout one’s lifetime, virtue, character, and morality are sought, through different ideals and methods, with the overall endgame being the most ethical and desirable outcome possible. There are times, however, when an individual may feel like there is no hope of reaching a successful existence; therefore the act of suicide becomes a viable option. The decision to voluntarily take one’s life has always been a topic of discussion on ethical grounds. Whether or not the decision to die is an ethical one can be argued depending on from which ethical theory the act is being evaluated.
In Utilitarianism, J.S. Mill gives an account for the reasons one must abide by the principles of Utilitarianism. Also referred to as the Greatest-happiness Principle, this doctrine promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. More specifically, Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, holding that the right act is that which yields the greatest net utility, or "the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain", for all individuals affected by said act (Joyce, lecture notes from 03/30).
“Utilitarianism is the creed which accepts as the foundations of morals utility of the greatest happiness principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” (Mil, 90). Utilitarianism ethics is based on the greatest good for the greatest number meaning that the moral agent does what he/she thinks will be
Two noteworthy ethical theories endeavor to indicate and legitimize moral guidelines and rules: utilitarianism and deontological morals. Utilitarianism is an ethical hypothesis created and refined in the current world in the compositions of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. There are a few assortments of utilitarianism. Fundamentally, a practical way to deal with profound quality infers that no ethical demonstration or tenet is inherently right or off-base. Or maybe, the rightness or misleading quality of a presentation or standard is exclusively a matter of the no ethical excellent delivered in the outcomes of doing that demonstration or taking after that run the show. In whole, as indicated by utilitarianism, ethical quality involves the
The main principle of utilitarianism is the greatest happiness principle. It states that, "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure" (Mill, 1863, Ch. 2, p330). In other words, it results with the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people that are involved.
In Utilitarianism the aim of our actions is to achieve happiness for the greatest number of people. “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” (Mill, 1971). Utilitarianism directly appeals to human emotions and our reactions to different events. Emotions are a fundamental Way of Knowing and influence both ethical and economical theories. In most cultures there are fundame...
Act utilitarianism is applied to any situation where an individual action has consequences. For example, if you were given the choice to lie to someone to not upset them, the consequences of that action would decide whether it is
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that approaches moral questions of right and wrong by considering the actual consequences of a variety of possible actions. These consequences are generally those that either positively or negatively affect other living beings. If there are both good and bad actual consequences of a particular action, the moral individual must weigh the good against the bad and go with the action that will produce the most good for the most amount of people. If the individual finds that there are only bad consequences, then she must go with the behavior that causes the least amount of bad consequences to the least amount of people. There are many different methods for calculating the utility of each moral decision and coming up with the best
Utilitarianism is a theory aimed at defining one simple basis that can be applied when making any ethical decision. It is based on a human’s natural instinct to seek pleasure and avoid pain.
Act-utilitarianism is a theory suggesting that actions are right if their utility or product is at least as great as anything else that could be done in the situation or circumstance. Despite Mill's conviction that act-utilitarianism is an acceptable and satisfying moral theory there are recognized problems. The main objection to act-utilitarianism is that it seems to be too permissive, capable of justifying any crime, and even making it morally obligatory to do so. This theory gives rise to the i...
Utilitarians believe that the moral worth of an action is determined solely by its contribution to overall utility, otherwise known as the Greatest Happiness theory. Most people now would be considered to be utilitarian because many believe that something could be morally right if it gives good results a greater amount of people. A modern parallel to the attitude of utilitarianism are
Utilitarianism can be defined as: the right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarians seem to believe that humans only have two desires, or motivations: happiness and pain. They want as much happiness as possible and the least amount of pain as any other action. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory, meaning that whether it is right, depends solely on its consequences.
Act utilitarians like Bentham believe that an action is right or wrong depending on what good will the society results from it. Even if the action individually is not necessarily morally right as long as the ending result is beneficial for the society, that action is then considered right. For act utilitarians the end justifies the mean. Actions are also evaluated individually. It may be right for Tim to steal a pen in situation A but wrong for Ben to steal one in situation B. It will depend on the