Achievement Gap In Education

3259 Words7 Pages

In education, when referring to the difference in performance between groups of students, often the phrase “achievement gap” is used rather than the more appropriate term, opportunity gap. The term ‘achievement gap’ further exemplifies the way society chooses to narrate this issue. This opportunity gap shows up in grades, course selection, standardized-test scores, dropout rate, and college-completion rates, amongst other success measures. A lot of the time the main focus is simply on the gap itself, and the conversation behind the cause of this is missing. They don’t want to talk about poverty or segregation, only about test score gaps. Despite politicians trying to address this issue by enacting policies such as the No Child Left Behind …show more content…

In order to make progress, a much greater emphasis must be placed on our children, who are not yet integrated into our society, and enable them to see that equal opportunity is the right of all American Citizens, ultimately stopping and correcting the interpolation …show more content…

Each member of the community should be conscious of the impact they have on these young kids and realize that they are the future of our country. They are like sponges; they absorb information at speeds that are hard to keep up with. The environment and those they interact with during this crucial time of development are what they will start to adopt within themselves and project into their futures. Where the main focus is on the gaining of knowledge and skills, teaching should be done in a way that allows students to make mistakes, take risks, and support each other when doing things that are unfamiliar to them; a place where knowledge is shared and bounced off one another. An approach by Newman and Holzman’s, influenced by Vygosky’s concept of the zone of proximal development (zpd) creates a place of education through improvisational activities. “According to Newman and Holzman (1993) the creation of zpd is not a took for the development of the individual-it is collective activity and what develops is the collective’s (i.e. dyad, group, class, etc.) ability to create zones of proximal development”(Lobman 1). In schools were teachers are trained in improvisational teaching, there is no line that separates the “more developed” from the “less developed,” which is almost always seen midst diverse schools. Instead of forcing knowledge onto students

Open Document