Absolute Validity Behind The Interview Process

1825 Words4 Pages

When it comes to the absolute validity behind an interview process, the answer can become a bit complex. There are a number of different things that can be wrong with the way interviews are given. Each interview process should look drastically different, depending on the level of job or complexity of the work. Without taking the proper steps to ensuring that your interview process is beneficial, it is difficult to ensure the right person is being hired for that particular job. Schmidt and Hunter conducted a meta analysis to determine what methods are the most effective tools to use while interviewing a potential new client. Per their research, there are at least 19 different ways for an interview team to conduct personnel measures. The exceptionally …show more content…

To begin, the researchers came up with a 12-dimension scale of coding based onthe mission statements from colleges around the nations. Their findings concluded that the collection of biodata by a more standardized survey scale, rather than the typical open ended question format, did in fact give the researchers greater ability to code the information based on those 12 dimension they previously decided upon. That scale was used measured against student’s GPA for their first year in college to determine if the biodata accurately predicted college performance (Oswald et al, 2004). Situational Judgment Inventory tests were also distributed to all 644 participants and used to measure future college performance as well. SJI tests are given by presenting the participant with a prompt and asking them to indicate which of the response sets given they would most relate to. Results from this study indicated that there is something to be said for collecting biographical data on a standardized scale as well as the use of SJI measures, when it comes to predicting future performance in college students (Oswald et al., 2004). Unfortunately, the clear majority of colleges do not use this method because it takes away the ability for applicants to use their own words to explain how their past will assist …show more content…

Unstructured interviews have no real set format for them to follow (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998). The interview can take the shape of whatever the individual being interviewed wants it to. Through unstructured interviews there may be prompt questions that the interviewer is given, but no real specific format is followed. This makes it hard for one applicant to stand out above another because their answers all take such a different shape. Interviewers are not looking for one specific answer during unstructured interviews. It almost becomes a matter of who can answer the questions in a format that relates to the interviewer, creating the easiest conversations. People are more likely to hire those who like themselves, making unstructured interviews somewhat biased without even knowing it. On the other hand, structured interviews allow for a much more professional interview. In these interviews, a specific set of questions are asked in which the interviewer knows exactly what response he or she is expecting to receive. Structured interviews hold a much stronger validity because there is no room for bias to appear. It simply comes down to, which applicant answered the questions in a way that coincides with the previously set response that the interview team is looking for (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998). Granted this

Open Document