Abortion is Not Murder

1201 Words3 Pages

Abortion is Not Murder

Is abortion murder? Murder is defined as "illegal killing with malice aforethought." Abortion fails this definition for two reasons. First, abortion is not illegal, and second, there is no evidence to suggest that expecting mothers feel malice towards their own flesh and blood.

Not all killing is murder, of course. Murder is actually a small subset of all killing, which includes accidental homicide, killing in self-defense, suicide, euthanasia, etc. When pro-life activists call abortion "murder," they are suggesting that abortion fits the definition of murder, namely, "illegal killing with malice aforethought." However, abortion fails this definition for two reasons. First, abortion is not illegal, and second, mothers hardly feel malice towards their own unborn children.

Some might object the first point is overly legalistic. Just because killing is legal doesn't make it right. Exterminating Jews in Nazi Germany was certainly legal, but few doubt that it was murder.

But why do we still consider the Holocaust murder? The answer is that we hold the Nazis to a higher law. When the Nazis were tried in Nuremberg for their war crimes, they were not accused of "crimes against Germans" or even "crimes against Jews." Instead, they were charged with "crimes against humanity." The reason is because there was no legal basis to charge them otherwise. The massacre of Jews was legal under German law. So in order to punish the German leaders for clearly wrong behavior, the Allies had to evoke a higher law, a law of humanity. (1) The Holocaust was condemned as illegal, and therefore murder, because it violated this law.

Many pro-life advocates claim that the same reasoning applies to abortion. Alt...

... middle of paper ...

...heir legal basis is still a matter of controversy. Germany never signed an agreement of international law prohibiting genocide -- indeed, genocide was declared a violation of international law only at the Nuremberg trials themselves. In other words, the Allies retroactively applied international law to the Nazi war crimes. Ultimately, the legal basis for the Nazis' prosecution rested on the law of world opinion, or even, many claimed, the law of God. This raises many thorny questions, such as: whose opinion? And whose God? When the criminals are as obviously evil as the Nazis, then world opinion tends to be united, and there is no controversy. But what about a subject like abortion, in which the majority of public opinion is pro-choice, and on which most religions have different teachings? In this case, evoking a "higher law" becomes problematic, to say the least.

Show More
Related

  • Affordable Housing Program: A Case Study

    855 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, in 2001, federal government once again entered the housing field with the announcement of funding for Affordable Housing Program (AHP) to be administered by the province, and soon, in 2002, signed an agreement with Ontario under the Canada/Ontario AHP for 5 years, with a condition that the province would match the federal funds for the program (ONPHA, n.d.). However, in its agreement with the federal government, Ontario passed a huge portion of matching funds to its municipalities (ONPHA, n.d). Later, in 2007, Homeless Partnering Strategy , a federal homeless funding, initially meant only to prevent and reduce homelessness in the country, became one of the main sources for the City to employ for building new housing (ONPHA, n.d.).

    Read More

  • Charles Dickens' Great Expectations

    1448 Words  | 3 Pages

    The story begins in a village near the marshes where a young boy named Pip lives. Because his parents are dead, he lives with his sister, Mrs. Joe Gargery and her husband Joe who’s a blacksmith and Pip’s trusted friend. Pip doesn’t have much of a future, he’s destined to become Joe’s apprentice and eventually a blacksmith. Then, Pip meets a convict out on the marshes. It seems like nothing important, despite it being frightening, but this meeting will change his life forever.

    Read More

  • Against Abortion

    1344 Words  | 3 Pages

    The result of murder and abortion is killing a human being, therefore how is abortion not illegal. A life of a fetus should not be taken advantage of even if it is in the mother. A life starts the moment it is conceived which means there is no difference between us and those millions of unborn babies that have died because of abortion. Both men and women do not realize that abortion can cause many health risks that may affect their future. Abortion lowers the chances of conceiving again and may cause mental health issues. Abortion should not be legal because everyone in this world is allowed to live and no one is allowed to take that right away from us. Around the world, women are being forced to abort their baby is that ethical to

    Read More

  • Abortion

    808 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though abortion is legal in the United States it should be considered murder. The heart and brain are one of the first things to develop on the newborn baby, which can conclude that the baby has feelings (“Surgical Abortions”). A surgeon and a baby can be equivalent to a mechanic and the car it is working on, it is their job to get the car out and running in one piece. The difference between the car and the baby is that a car comes in parts and can be easily taken apart like most machines. All vehicles have multiple parts to them that can be taken away or can be added to them. But, once a child is taken away, they are gone forever, that specific child can never be brought back into the world unlike a machine such as a car. A single celled organism is considered a life; therefore, an unborn fetus should be considered a life as well. Sometimes, the circumstances surrounding a pregnancy may be tragic. Perhaps the woman was raped and became pregnant, the baby had been diagnosed with a defect, or the woman’s health might be at risk. Accordingly so, making an abortion seem like it may be okay due to those tragic events. However, one tragedy will not answer these problems with another one occurring. Murdering could be easily defined as killing somebody who does not want to be killed, as well as, cannot speak for one selves (Dictionary).

    Read More

  • Charles Dickens' Bleak House

    1262 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Bleak House, by Charles Dickens, Mr. Vholes is Richard Carstone’s legal advisor. Introduced to Richard by Mr. Skimpole, Vholes encourages and assists Richard as he attempts to unravel the mysteries of the Jarndyce and Jarndyce case in Chancery. Vholes, however, may not have the best intentions. Through descriptions of his gloomy physical appearance, suspicious actions, and unfortunate connections to English law, Dickens paints a vivid image of Mr. Vholes—a man who cannot be trusted. Vholes, therefore, is made up of multiple layers; as each layer peels away, the reader understands a little bit more of this secretive man. Surprisingly, Mr. Vholes is seen as more and more evil as readers journey to the center of his being.

    Read More

  • Abortion: Pro-life!

    487 Words  | 1 Pages

    A mere four days later, the heart starts beating. Is abortion murder though? According to the Webster Dictionary, abortion is to terminate a pregnancy because the baby is not capable of living.

    Read More

  • Functionalist Argument For The Holocaust

    882 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the Holocaust the mass murder of jews was a worldwide tragedy and when a tragedy happens usually your first question is why? The two groups of devoted researchers for the Holocaust are split into the Intentionalist group and the Functionalist group. As said by Mimi-Cecilia Pascoe in Intentionalism and Functionalism: Explaining the Holocaust “The intentionalist position suffers greatly from a lack of adequate evidence, and consequently cannot prove Hitler’s intentions beyond reasonable doubt. On the other hand, the functionalist position is better able to compensate for the lack of evidence, and thus provides a more solid historical explanation for the Holocaust (Pascoe 1).” The on going argument of whether the Holocaust was intentional or a choice in the moment is the Intentionalist vs. Functionalist case and either side has many different ways of portraying their evidence on the topic; the arguments are both have convincing arguments but in

    Read More

  • Abortion should be Banned

    410 Words  | 1 Pages

    A mother kills her unborn child because it is unwanted, but she's not charged for murder. Is it right? There is about 46 million abortions per year worldwide, and approximately 115,000 per day, but why? Is it because rape or incest, health problems with either the mother or the child, or just because the baby's unwanted or inconvenient at the time? (The Alan Guttmacher Institute.) Abortion should be banned because too many babies are being killed from abortion, if you don't want a child you could always put it up for adoption, and most mothers don't understand the consequences that occur from abortion.

    Read More

  • Abortion Is Morally Permissible

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    Those who adamantly oppose abortion are regarded as pro-life and those who are supporters of abortion are considered pro-choice by contemporary standards. Even among those who advocate abortion, there are discrepancies in their views such as up until what point in the pregnancy is abortion morally permissible. In my opinion, abortion is morally permissible at any stage in a woman’s pregnancy. This is ethically acceptable because a woman should have the right to control what goes on within her body. Along with this, fetuses are still far from personhood (having the qualities of a human being); therefore, we cannot liken abortion to any variety of murderous activity.

    Read More

  • Charles Dickens' Great Expectations

    2231 Words  | 5 Pages

    believe he is a funny character and I think he is the character I can

    Read More

  • Charles Dickens' Great Expectations

    606 Words  | 2 Pages

    ago; this man is his true benefactor. Pip finally knows the truth about this man. Magwitch is Estella’s

    Read More

  • Charles Dickens' Great Expectations

    1910 Words  | 4 Pages

    Later, when Pip is endowed with his unexpected fortune, he becomes selfish, greedy, and makes excuses for himself not to keep in touch with Joe and Biddy. As he goes through the process of making out his bills, he illustrates his ability to fool himself and to turn his face away from reality towards what is empty and false. “There was a gay fiction among us that we were constantly enjoying ourselves, and a skeleton truth that we never did” (336).

    Read More

  • Why Abortion Is Murder

    835 Words  | 2 Pages

    Some people compare abortion, a widely controversial topic, to murder because it is ending a life. Although there is actually no way to pinpoint when life begins. Some believe that life begins at conception, while others do not. Some say that when a baby first moves it is given the right to life, while others do not support this claim. Therefore, there is no true way to dictate whether abortion is murder or not.

    Read More

  • Charles Dickens' Great Expectations

    2217 Words  | 5 Pages

    In Charles Dickens' Great Expectations, the reader is taken through the journey of a little boy as he pursuits his dream and great expectations beyond his common self. Pip's, the protagonist, dream of becoming a gentleman is realized upon his meeting of Estella, the love of his life. Pip changes from an innocent, sensitive and common young boy to a selfish, rejecting adolescent. He is led into making grave mistakes based on his false expectations of marrying Estella and being a gentleman. In the end, he learns that all his aspirations have been based on false presumptions and expectation of his ability to rise above his past and become something better.

    Read More

  • Dickens' Great Expectations

    1386 Words  | 3 Pages

    Joe coming to London to look after Pip whom is ill and in debt; I will

    Read More

More about Abortion is Not Murder

Open Document