ASA Self Regulation

1724 Words4 Pages

“If an advert breaks the rules, it may be withdrawn. If the product doesn’t match the description or the advert breaks the law, you could be prosecuted” (ASA and CAP, 2018) this means all businesses should follow the rules correctly or they could be taken to the court and fined. Advertisers need to follow the rules to stay in competition and do not lose customers. There are 2 types of regulations;

Self-regulation is empowered by social responsibility which an individual or organisation who has the rights to act for the benefit of the society at large, social responsibility is not just aimed at the business organisation who has impacted the society but also involves everyone in the environment. (ASA and CAP, 2018) This is a non-broadcast advertising. …show more content…

ASA protects consumer’s rights and helps them retain confidence. They work out if the advertisement is right to be shown on media and they deal with all type of adverts that affects a person’s physical and emotional development. They focus on the rules of the advertisements rather than the number of complaints from people, this therefore gives businesses fair rights. ASA works with other specialists to come up with a conclusion about the advertisements, this is so they could treat advertisers fairly and help consumers from mislead advertisement, which will help consumers regain their confidence. The main aim of institution is to get better communication and increase their knowledge by asking other organisations for help when the issue cannot be dealt by ASA institution. ASA works with advertisers, trade bodies, consumer and pressure groups, regulatory partners, media owners and independent experts. They help ASA make the right decisions. (ASA and CAP, 2018). ASA does not deal with complaints such as update of advertisement regarding products, the quality of the service and confidential data provided by the business because these are legislations and CAP deals with complaints regarding this issue. For example, in the article it states Purple Brick were upheld a complain because television advert had not made …show more content…

In 1998 the act covered information about data stored on the computer or organised paper. The organisations are not allowed to share information of customers to others because it will break the trust of the customer and the customer may go ahead and get the company into trouble. (BBC Bitesize, 2014) Therefore, this act is put in place to protect the rights of customers and stop them from being exploited. They could gain a lot of benefits from this as they will feel safe when giving personal information. for example, Sony was fined because of their data which was not up to date and hackers got hold of people’s personal data, this ruined Sony’s reputation because the customers will not be able to trust the company anymore and they will have a massive fall in market sale. Organisations should take this into consideration and always stay up to date because competition is a massive distraction for the companies. (TheDrum,

Open Document