A Rose For Emily And Usl At The Stadium Analysis

1712 Words4 Pages

In William Faulkner’s short story, “A Rose for Emily,” Emily keeps herself inside her house all of the time leaving the rest of the town to ponder about her life. Furthermore, they are constantly judging Miss Emily’s actions. As time passes, rumors and new gossip continue to evolve about Miss Emily and what her life had consisted of. After reading the text I still remain wondering, why are people so engrossed in what Miss Emily Grierson is doing with her life? Quite similarly, in “Usl at the Stadium,” written by Rivka Galchen, Usl’s life was drastically viewed by what other people said about him without actually knowing any facts. Falling asleep at a baseball game lead to a long grapevine of new rumors of what others thought about Usl.
Since people do not know the background of everyone, they attempt to fill in the gaps and end up creating their own story. In William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” and Rivka Galchen’s “Usl at the Stadium,” the authors leave out important information of the characters’ lives, which allows society to come up with their own stories for the characters instead.
In “A Rose for Emily,” it starts to quickly show how low the neighborly women’s morals are since they only went to the funeral “out of curiosity to see her house” (Faulkner). Their constant curiosity built up around a woman they actually …show more content…

After her father’s death, the old town government officials exempted Miss Emily from paying taxes, but when new officials came in, they wanted her to pay. “Colonel Sartoris invented an involved tale to the effect that Miss Emily’s father had loaned money to the town, which the town, as a matter of business, preferred this way of repaying.” She did not know any different and did not want things to change, but everyone else pictured it as her being better than them. “I have no taxes in Jefferson,” is what she repeatedly told the officials that came to talk to

Open Document