A Rose For Emily And Trifles Analysis

1103 Words3 Pages

America, if not the world, has always been infatuated with murder stories, movies, and shows. There are countless shows that revolve around solving crimes and finding killers and it seems like more and more keep popping up. There’s something about learning about a killers motives and why they’ve committed the crime that draws people in rapidly. Most people would think of killers as psychopaths. There are two stories that we read throughout this semester that, to me, seemed to have a psychopathic or somehow psychologically disturbed killer in them. “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner and “Trifles” by Susan Glaspell show us two women who are seemingly harmless that end up being killers. In “A Rose For Emily” the narrator talks a lot about …show more content…

The townspeople were unaware of this. They had thought that the Colonel had left Miss Emily and never showed his face in town again. That’s probably why they were so shocked when they found his body in the upstairs room. The signs all pointed to Miss Emily having killed her lover. If going crazy did run in her family then she must have just snapped when her lover tried to leave her. The town mayor had gotten numerous complaints about an awful smell coming from Miss Emily’s house. No one even thought twice about what the smell could’ve been, instead the narrator says, “ So the next night, after midnight, four men crossed Miss Emily’s lawn and slunk about the house like burglars, sniffing along the base of the brickwork and at the cellar openings while one of them performed a regular sowing motion with his hand out of a sack slung from his shoulder.” (Faulkner 32). The men covered up the smell, which was most likely the horrid smell of a rotting corpse, and once the smell went away, no one thought about it again. Another sign that pointed towards Miss Emily having killed her lover was a strange encounter she had with the druggist in the town. She said, “I want poison” (Faulkner 33) and then went on to say “I want the best you have. I don’t care what kind.” (Faulkner 33). She wasn’t even trying to hide what she was doing. She almost made it sort of obvious, yet no …show more content…

Wright seems to have suddenly had a psychotic break. She has very strange behavior and is not apparently normal for her. There is incredibly important dialogue between Mr. Hale and Mrs. Wright that show that she’s acting out of character. “I said, ‘How do you do Mrs. Wright, its cold, ain’t it?’ and she said, ‘Is it?’ – and went on kind of pleating at her apron. Well, I was surprised; she didn’t ask me to come up to the stove, or to set down, but just sat there, not even looking at me, so i said, ‘I want to see John.’ And then she – laughed. I guess you would call it a laugh. I thought of harry and the team outside, so I said a little sharp: ‘Can’t I see John?’ No’, she says kind o’ dull like. ‘Ain’t he home?’ says I ‘Yes,’ says she, ‘he’s home.’ ‘Then why can’t I see him?’ I asked her, out of patience. ‘Cause he’s dead,’ says she.” (Glaspell 852). The interesting thing about Mrs. Wright’s conversation with Mr. Hale is that she doesn’t necessarily try to cover up the fact that John is dead. She doesn’t say that she’s killed him or anything like that, but she simply states that he’s dead. She even laughs at Mr. Hale’s persistence to see john, which shows that she may have gone somewhat crazy. She doesn’t seem to feel any

Open Document