A Rhetorical Analysis On Helping A Friends

635 Words2 Pages

On March 8, 2018, I observed Ms. Durkin conduct a small reading group with six students. The students read the article titled “Helping a Friend” by ReadWorks. Following their reading, they answered seven comprehension questions. To summarize the article, ReadWorks shares the friendship between Enzo and Zoe. As both children run a race, Enzo fell and hurt his knee. Although Zoe was close to the finish line, she looked back at her friend. What decision should she make? The article mentions that Zoe could win if she kept running, or she could stop the race and help her friend. Zoe chose the latter option, and expressed her confidence that her friend would do the same for her, if she fell.
To start the small group instruction, Ms. Durkin immediately …show more content…

The soft voices made utterances in unison at times; and at other times, one or two voices became increasingly louder.
Occasionally, Ms. Durkin extended her finger to help Oscar track the reading. Oscar, the same student that attempted to predict the story’s plot, is close to achieving benchmark—like his five other classmates. Hence, Ms. Durkin allowed him to join the group. I would classify my observations as seeing like-readiness peers collaborate on an assignment. Even though Oscar peered at his neighbor’s paper several times, every child worked hard to read and contribute to their small group.
By the time the students ended their reading and learned about Zoe’s kind action, they learned a new vocabulary word, empathy. With the seven questions at the end, I want to reflect on Question #6: What did you learn from “Helping a Friend”? That question allowed students to synthesize their answers, and I recognized a behavior I learned from ED 517 about human development. According to Vygotsky, “private speech is vocalized speech addressed and adapted to oneself. Thus, private speech is neither social communication nor silent thought, but vocalized thought” (Jones, 2009, p. 169). With heads aimed in the air and lips moving with silent thoughts, the children were alone in their processes of thinking. Their thoughts were not directed to others, and they were formulating …show more content…

First, when an educator makes grouping flexible, all students have the opportunity to reach benchmarks. While Oscar was not exactly at the level of his peers, through cognitive partnership, peers are capable of advancing each other’s learning. Second, encouraging students to perform higher-order thinking extends children’s learning. Although Oscar mentioned that the story was about helping a friend, by asking the right question, students made real-life connections. Third, by making personal connections and text-to-text connections, students experience learning that is meaningful, relevant, and coherent. Finally, educators should always have the mindset to “teach up.” I appreciate that Ms. Durkin did not underestimate her students’ abilities to learn the word empathy. As an abstract noun, she related the reading passage to the idea and quality of being a compassionate friend. Ms. Durkin truly aims high with learning and makes sure she scaffolds her students to reach those

Open Document