A Rhetorical Analysis Of Sir Ken Robinson's Changing Educational Paradigms

1270 Words3 Pages

This rhetorical analysis is on a speech given by Sir Ken Robinson called “Changing Educational Paradigms.” Robinson is a former educator, who shifted his focus towards education reform, and has given many speeches on the subject. In this speech, Robinson shares with us his views and concerns on the current condition of our Western system of education. Robinson explains how the intellectual and cultural influence of the Enlightenment Age along with the economic circumstances of the Industrial Revolution helped conceive our current system of education. He talks about the way we educate our children today, giving special attention to shocking truths about attention disorders. Our speaker also discusses how we learn and why the current methods …show more content…

He reminds us that creativity is how we use our imaginations to come up with great ideas, and then he introduces the concept of divergent thinking, which is a way to use creativity to come up with several solutions to a single problem. Robinson tells us about a recent study that involved divergent thinking. Fifteen hundred people were involved in this study, and asked: “How many uses can you think of for a paper clip?” Someone who could list ten to fifteen things was considered average, but a list of 200 things was genius. In class, we attempted to tackle this question in groups, and my group came up with thirteen. Now, at this point in the speech, Robinson asks his audience to guesstimate how many of the 1,500 people ranked a genius level. Only after the guesses, did he reveal that the test subjects were all actually kindergarteners. That test showed that 98% of those little kids each scored a genius level, because of divergent thinking. Children were curious to know if the paper clip could be a different size and made of something else. Furthermore, this was a longitudinal study, meaning that the same group of children was tested five, and then ten years after that first test date. I am under the impression that these children tested as a group and not individually, so, I think it was a powerful example, because it shows what we are capable of, and what we become as time goes on. Robinson also mentioned that when a group gets together in school to compare answers, it might be perceived as cheating; yet, in a job setting where groups get together, that is collaborating. I feel that there is great value in learning by discussing some things with our peers. When finished, the study overall revealed that as the children got older, and more educated, fewer and fewer were able to reach genius score. This

Open Document