A Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Ours' By Perry Patetic

495 Words1 Page

In today's world people have everything: cars, thrains, planes etc., that makes it really easy for them to move away from the people and places of their past, and makes sometimes easy to come back and travel a distances to see family again. Patetic in his argument asserts that distances tend to lack the close, supportive relationships, that people generations enjoyed. The author supports his position by first, providing reasons and examples from real life. He continues by demonstrating the results of far living kind of relationships. The author’s purpose is to persuade the readers so that families will stop leaving so far away from each other. The author establishes a formal tone for families, that live miles away from each other. Patetic argues that families losing each other because of long distances, that separate them. His argument is true, in some point long distances are breaking the relationships. …show more content…

“Ours is an open, past-moving society - equipped with cars, trains - that makes it too easy for us to move away from the people of our past.” - Perry Patetic. Same apply is, if people were coming back. It’s also easy to return back. But however is not true. For some families it would be harder than the other families, because of the distances and money for transportation. For example, I’ll use personal experience. It would cost me one grand to go back in Russia to see rest of my family. Thousand dollars is a lot of money. I would have to work for three month to only save that amount of money to go there, and that is makes me to not go, and only wait until I’ll save a lot. Overall, for some people it’s hard to visit families that lives far

Open Document