A Literary Analysis of the Solutions Used in the Two Texts, Shooting an Elephant, and No Witchcraft for Sale

658 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Determining decision making

Many times in life, people get put into situations in which they have to make some kind of solution to a problem that they are faced with. One example of this is when I was faced with the choice to either call the police or not when I spotted shoplifting in Washington D.C. just the other day. I was just standing there, when I noticed two women scooping stuff into their giant purses and then they ran out of a store. I was in so much shock that I couldn’t say anything; although after the incident happened, I had the choice of either calling the police or not. In relation, there are two texts in this section that deal with people that have to make a choice on making a solution to a problem. In the text, Shooting an Elephant, by George Orwell, the speaker is faced with the decision to shoot and kill a rampaging elephant. In the text, No Witchcraft for Sale, by Doris Lessing, the character Gideon is faced with the decision on whether to give the white scientists his medicinal theories that saved a boy from going blind. In both of the texts, Shooting an Elephant, and No Witchcraft for Sale, the solutions are either good or bad. Initially, in the text Elephant, by Orwell, the speaker, who is actually a younger Orwell back when he was a policeman for England stationed in Burma, is faced with the decision to shoot an elephant that is running around like crazy, destroying everything because it is in must, or in heat. Although the elephant is destroying things, it is also a very important animal to the people of Burma, because they use it for farming, and other things. The thing that really messes Orwell up is the fact that there is peer pressure mixed into his feelings. The other police officers believe that killing the elephant is the ri... ... middle of paper ... ...ll bugs him, saying, “I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool.”(Pg. 1326). In the end, Gideon’s solution was way better than Orwell’s. In conclusion, there are obviously good and bad solutions in life, including ones in the texts from this section of our text book. First of all, in the text Shooting an Elephant, by George Orwell, the speaker, Orwell, makes the solution of shooting a crazy elephant in order to not look weak or foolish. In addition, in the text No Witchcraft for Sale, by Doris Lessing, the character Gideon’s solution to his problem is to send the wanting scientists on a wild goose chase to find the plant that he used to heal the little boy Teddy’s eyes from snake venom. Although both may not be perfect solutions to their problems, the better of the two would obviously be Gideon’s solution.

Show More
Related

  • Homeless Hotspots Case Study

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    it hard to choose an alternative. “When resolving moral dilemmas one is presented with two or

    Read More

  • Compression, Evil And Confliction In George Orwell's Shooting An Elephant

    854 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “Shooting an Elephant,” Orwell experiences humiliation. “When a nimble Burman tripped me up on the football field and the referee looked the other way, the crowd yelled with hideous laughter” (p.323) His profession of being a police officer made him an enemy and a target to most people in town. “None of them had anything to do except stand on the street corners and jeer at Europeans.” (pg.323) The natives spent most of their time picking on Europeans who were

    Read More

  • Shooting an Elephant

    422 Words  | 1 Pages

    A police officer in the British Raj, the supposedly 'unbreakable'; ruling force, was afraid. With his gun aimed at a elephant's head, he was faced with the decision to pull the trigger. That officer was George Orwell, and he writes about his experience in his short story, 'Shooting an Elephant';. To save face, he shrugged it off as his desire to 'avoid looking the fool'; (George Orwell, 283). In truth, the atmosphere of fear and pressure overwhelmed him. His inner struggle over the guilt of being involved in the subjugation of a people added to this strain, and he made a decision he would later regret enough to write this story.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant"

    2836 Words  | 6 Pages

    "Shooting an Elephant" is one of the most popular of George Orwell's essays. Like his essays "A hanging" and "How the Poor Die", it is chiefly autobiographical. It deals with his experience as a police-officer in Burma. After having completed his education, Orwell joined the Indian Imperial Police, and served in Burma, from 1922 to 1927, as an Assistant Superintendent of Police. His experiences as an officer in Burma were bitter. He was often a victim of the hostility and injustices at the hands of his colleagues and officers. Peter Stansky and William Abrahams in their book The Unknown Orwell write "He was friendless and inexperienced, not certain of what to expect and fearful of proving to be inadequate, a predictable failure."

    Read More

  • The Use of Metaphors in Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this story ,Orwell is taking part in imperialism by proving his power and dignity to the natives presenting imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals. He is using the elephant as a symbol of imperialism representing power as an untamed animal that has control over the village. He uses a large and very powerful animal to represent a significant metaphor for imperialism.. In doing so he leads to the understanding that the power behind imperialism is only as strong as its dominant rulers. Orwell?s moral values are challenged in many different ways, ironically enough while he too was the oppressor. He is faced with a very important decision of whether or not he should shoot the elephant. If he does so, he will be a hero to his people. In turn, he would be giving in to the imperial force behind the elephant that he finds so unjust and evil. If he lets the elephant go free and unharmed the natives will laugh at him and make him feel inferior for not being able to protect the...

    Read More

  • Shooting An Elephant Analysis

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    George Orwell was a British author, novelist, essayist, and critic. In the year of 1836, Orwell wrote the essay called Shooting an Elephant. While working as a police officer for the British Empire in Burma, Orwell experienced an event that inspired him to write his essay. This essay, was written for the British people, in order to make them aware of the injustice and cruelty of Imperialism. This essay explores the negative impact that Imperialism has on those who are being governed under it, but also on those who are in power, exercising it. Shooting an elephant also explores the strong power that peer pressure can have over the decisions one make and the way one act.

    Read More

  • Pressured To Shoot An Elephant?

    1728 Words  | 4 Pages

    Shooting an Elephant is an essay written by George Orwell to have people understand him better as to why he made the decision to shoot an elephant. After reading this essay, some might think that Orwell is a coward for not actually doing what his conscience told him to do. This is completely accurate. He does something that he himself knows is wrong, which is shooting the elephant. Now let’s look at the whole picture here first. For example: What caused this to happen? What was the motive behind it? Did he have motive at all? If not, why did he shoot the elephant? This entire tragedy could have been prevented if specific people’s morals were in the right places.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell

    328 Words  | 1 Pages

    In "shooting an elephant," Orwell's writes about Burma when it was a British colony.The story told by a first-person narrator who is a British policeman serving in Burma. His relationship with the Burmese natives wasn't that good; he was hated by everyone because he was a foreigner and a authority figure of white English society. The action of the story starts with a rogue elephant that has killed a Burmese man. The narrator finds the elephant standing peacefully in a field. He does not want to kill the elephant, but he knows the large crowd of people who have followed him to the field expect

    Read More

  • The Rhetorical Analysis Of George Orwell's Shooting An Elephant

    781 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every day, each individual will look back on decisions he or she have made and mature from those experiences. Though it takes time to realize these choices, the morals and knowledge obtained from them are priceless. In George Orwell’s nonfictional essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, a young Orwell was stationed in Burma for the British imperial forces, tasked to deal with an elephant who destroyed various parts of the village Moulmein while its owner was away. Backed by second thoughts and a crowd of thousands, he finds himself shooting the elephant and reflecting that it was not justified; however, it was a choice pushed by his duty and the people. Written with a fusion of his young and old self’s outlook on shooting the elephant, Orwell’s essay is a sensational read that captivates his audience and leaves them questioning his decision.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Shooting An Elephant And George Orwell

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    When he finial find the elephant Orwell say “I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him.” But when he lays his eyes on the crowd he changes his stance to “but I did not want to shoot the elephant.”(Orwell 199). He felt guilty for shooting the elephant when he describe that the elephant worth more alive than dead, but despite the many reason not to shoot the elephant, he took a shot. Orwell describes “when I pulled the trigger I did not hear the bang or feel the kick …I fired again into the same spot…I fired a third time. That was the shot that did it for him.”(199) the shooting of the elephant represent the Burma people trying to stay alive and over powering by the

    Read More

  • Pride and Power in George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant" and "A Hanging"

    986 Words  | 2 Pages

    Based on the two essays, George Orwell is a vivid writer who uses a unique point of view and strong themes of pride and role playing to convey his messages. His writings are easy to pick out because of the strengths of these messages. Just like politicians in government, people with power turn corrupt to stay in power and keep their reputations. Anyone who takes on power must be prepared to live with the consequences of his actions. Orwell knows this challenge well and conveys this principle in his writing. After all, his narration is based on real life experiences and not fictional fantasies.

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis Of Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    Orwell’s use of symbolism is perhaps his greatest stylistic technique, as it weaves together the theme of Imperialism. The elephant represents British Imperialism, which Orwell must kill. Meanwhile, the cheering of the natives signifies his conscience throughout the novel. Before shooting the elephant, Orwell describes the crowd using a metaphor, a stylistic element by narrating, “And suddenly I realized I would have to shoot the elephant after all. The people expected it of me and I had got to do it; I could feel their two thousand wills pressing me forward, irresistibly” (299). Orwell uses a metaphor to describe the natives as a physical force, implying his want to earn the respect of the Burmese and go against his duties as an Imperial police officer. Orwell’s need to please the Burmese is seen when he shoots the elephant, freeing himself from representing British Rule. By using the natives as a form of conscience, the narrator is able to come to terms with his inner conflict and earn the respect of the

    Read More

  • What Is The Theme Of Symbolism In Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    In one hand, his guilt causes him to feel sympathetic for disowning and mistreating the natives he grew up alongside. However, this guilt is caused by his loyalty to his job even though he knows the evils of imperialism first hand. This results in Orwell loathing his job, imperialism, and the Burmese people oppressing him. In further examination of “Shooting an Elephant”, it is clear that Orwell uses an abundance of symbols in his writing. He uses specific objects or people to represent ideas and qualities that have a symbolic meaning such as the rise and decline of the oppressing imperialistic British empire, but mainly himself and his battle against his distraught mind and unbearable

    Read More

  • Moral Issues and Decisions in George Orwell's Shooting an Elephant

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell, he addresses his  internal battle with the issues of morality and immorality. He writes of several situations that show his immoral doings. When George Orwell signed up for a five-year position as a British officer in Burma he was unaware of the moral struggle that he was going to face. Likewise, he has an internal clash between his moral conscious and his immoral actions. Therefore, Orwell becomes a puppet to the will of the Burmese by abandoning his thoughts of moral righteousness. This conflicts with the moral issue of relying upon other's morals, rather than one's own conscience.

    Read More

  • Peer Pressure

    1118 Words  | 3 Pages

    Eric Arthur Blair, or better known by his pen name, George Orwell, was an early 20th century European writer. He lived from 1903 to 1950, where at one point he became a police officer in Moulmein, Lower Burma. He was not accepted in this anti-European society where if a woman would walk through a bazaar alone, someone was bound to spit betel juice all over her dress. Orwell then explained in his encounter with an elephant. Because he was the police officer of the town, he was told that an elephant ran rampant through the town, killing an Indian man. The town wanted Mr. Orwell to kill the elephant because it killed a person of their town! Orwell was being peer pressured by the townspeople to shoot the elephant, and he took the shot. Was the life of the elephant worth the death of one Indian man? Orwell made that decision when he pulled the trigger of his rifle. Every last bit of the elephant was gone within hours. The townspeople needed the elephant more for themselves than to commemorate the life of the Indian man. Orwell was pressured to make a decision that he did not ...

    Read More

More about A Literary Analysis of the Solutions Used in the Two Texts, Shooting an Elephant, and No Witchcraft for Sale

Open Document