A Jury Of Her Peers And Trifles Comparison

671 Words2 Pages

Point of view can have a tremendous impact on reading a passage, novel, and any other pieces of literature. Such characteristics of literature include the amount of visual aid, perspective as well as perception, even the amount of bias that is included. These comparisons can be observed in the two texts “Trifles” and A Jury of Her Peers written by Susan Glaspell. The two texts differ in overall format: play and short story; so as they have differences such as this, they also have similarities to note in the end. First, “Trifles” is a play script in which a crime is introduced without out right context towards the situation. It is written in third person objective, corresponding with the fact that visual details are revealed only with dialogue. …show more content…

It has a third person limited point of view so it includes paragraphs entirely dedicated to character’s thoughts as well as visual descriptions. In contrast to “Trifles” though, an intro is included, so the reader isn’t just thrown into a middle of a crime scene. “When Martha Hale opened…” (Jury 1). In the play, it starts within the scene of the rime, but in the short story, the entire first page or two is dedicated towards introducing the characters and the arrival to the Wright’s household. Next, a comparison in the levels of description in the two ever o varying texts. In the scene in which Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale decide to steal evidence, in “Trifles” it is described as “The women’s eyes meet for an instant.” (“Trifles” 722) whereas in A Jury of Her Peers, the scene is described as “Martha Hale sprang up… eyes met the eyes of the other woman… got it in the pocket of her big coat.” (Jury 14). In the short story, the scene is largely expanded so the reader does not have to assume much and the thoughts of the characters are revealed throughout the transaction. A Jury of Her Peers is a short story, third person limited, where assumption is not as necessary than with

Open Document