A Doll's House

1384 Words3 Pages

The nineteenth century was a time of male superiority and Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House, is a great example of the introduction of feminist actions in the nineteenth century. Nora, the protagonist, portrays these characteristics within her heavy decision on whether to leave her family and pursue her own life or to stay, continuing the controlled life she grew increasingly bored of. In addition, Christine Linde, Nora’s friend, also exhibits the rebellion in her gender standards when she comes into the town that Nora lived in looking for work so that she may provide for herself. The actions done by these characters would be considered noble and admirable nowadays, though this story was set back in the nineteenth century. Then, morals were …show more content…

“One of the telling ironies of the play is that Torvald, whose very profession as merchant banker depends upon extending credit and loans, is constantly asserting the economic evils of incurring debt: “No debts! Never borrow! There’s always something inhibited, something unpleasant, about a home built on credit and borrowed money” (203). His business life and his home life, it would seem, are kept stringently separate, as if the “home” were some inviolate haven against the encroachment of the money ethic on family life, as if the debtless competence of the wife were some compensation for his immersion in the nastiness of daily business.”(Errol Durbach) In addition to Nora’s departure, in the beginning of the play, she took it upon herself to handle a financial issue involving her family, lading to her committing a crime. Such independence was unheard of in the nineteenth century. Christine Linde is another example for this perspective. She came to town looking for work so that she could survive without her husband, another thing frowned upon by …show more content…

Three major characters are women and three major characters are men. The female characters are Nora, Mrs. Linde, and Anne-Marie;and the male characters are Torvald, Dr. Rank, and Krogstad. This balance of gender roles is intentional, and each character’s role in the story contributes to the final revelation that women can be strong, men can be weak, and strength and weakness are human traits, not gender traits. In many cases, ‘manly ideals’ (courage, dignity, seriousness) were elevated to ‘human ideals’ and female ideals (gentleness, kindness, active sympathy)

Open Document