A Comparison of Tess of the D'urbervilles and the Europeans

3305 Words7 Pages

`The Europeans' by Henry James and `Tess of the D'Urbervilles' by Thomas Hardy, although written at different stages of the Victorian era (James's work was written earlier), both reflect some of the same attitudes and mentalities of their time. In the first phase of `Tess' and the first two chapters of `The Europeans' the ideas of marriage and attitudes to women, class boundaries and family connections in Victorian life and society are portrayed. As the similarities between the novels show, the values continue to be held in society from the beginning of the era to the end, demonstrating how entrenched they were. They even cross the Atlantic to America as illustrated in Henry James' novel. Although there are similarities between the novels, there are likewise contrasts, mostly anchored in the very different styles of the two authors. The immediate parallel that must be made between the two works is the shared image of the poor relation who goes to `seek her fortune' and the theme of genealogical connections, Tess' with the D'Urbervilles and Eugenia with the Wentworths. Both plots are based on the pivotal meetings with `the rich people' of the family and the outcome of these reunions. The reasons for the missions being undertaken are also common to both books, introducing the general concern of Victorian society; marriage and `Victorian lucre' as Hardy describes it, his wryly sarcastic tone communicating to the reader the author's critical view on Victorian preoccupation with money. Indeed, the only motive of the Durbeyfields in claiming kin with the d'Urbervilles is mercenary; Joan believes that the reestablishment of connections would `lead to some noble gentleman marrying' Tess and making her `a lady'. It is a marriage of th... ... middle of paper ... ...rs that allows us, as Ian Gregor says, to `walk through' one of his novels. Where Hardy explores a story and we change and develop in our stance towards the characters and the plot as it unfolds before us, James is very much a story teller; we listen and are interested, but the fact that James was very concerned with the form and structure of his novels is significant. It seems to make his works more static and instead of `walking through' we `walk around' his work, rather as one might walk about a room admiring details of decoration. There is little movement or feeling of progress in James' novel and the work seems, to me as to Gregor, already complete. He encapsulates my reaction exactly; `we feel the work has already found its finest reader in the author, in Hardy the reading is still in process'; there is more to read into and more to appreciate with each perusal.

Open Document