A Comparison Of Violence And Nonviolence

804 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gandhi philosophy of nonviolence essay

The people who succeed against injustice are the people whom no one or nothing can stop. Injustice has always been present in people’s lives. It can hurt anyone on any subject. It normally comes when someone has more power in society over the victim. But everyone has an ego so they will stand up for themselves and fight against the injustice, but the important part is how they fight against the injustice. During history many have failed even though they were fighting back because they took the wrong path. Thus, although it may not be the desired path for people to take while fighting against injustice, but history has proven that both violence and nonviolence can be a solution but it’s the matter of when for each one.
Mohandas Gandhi provided the society with very good paths to get to peace and his ideology about the …show more content…

Malcom X supported the idea that if nonviolence does not work it’s better to use violence to end the injustice. In his autobiography he says, “The bible says there is time for anger”, so it wasn’t only his opinion, it was also encouraged by the book that most people in the United States follow. The bible is saying that there is a time for peace at one point and if the unfairness is not being stopped by non-violent ways, it’s best to take action and get rid of the problem. People look at violence as if it is the negative way and they discourage it, but we should look at the bright side of it. Violence can end all the problems and that can be proved with many different historical tragedies. For example the United States of America was built off of the idea of violence. The people wanted to fight against the unfairness of King George x with the revolutionary war, when the people wanted to fight against the unfairness of King George. So violence should sometimes be encouraged in order to get away from all the injustice and find

Show More
Related

  • Mahatma Gandhi Dbq

    626 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mohandas Gandhi was a non-violent promoter for Indian independence.He was married young at 13,and went to London to go to law school.Gandhi got his degree there and was on his way to being a lawyer.He went to his first case,but couldn't even speak. Gandhi then got invited to South Africa from a businessman. Gandhi’s luck their was no good either.European racism came to him,after he got kicked off of a train,because he was “colored” and was holding a first class ticket.When Gandhi fought back because of it,was arrested and was sent to jail.After this, he became know as as a leader.Gandhi returned to India in 1896,and he was disgusted by it.British wanted them to wear their clothes,copy their manners,accept their standards of beauty,but Gandhi refused.Gandhi wanted people to live free of all class and wealth.Gandhi tried so hard and was more successful then any other man in India.They won independence in 1947. Gandhi’s non-violent movement worked because,Gandhi used clever planning, mass appeal, conviction, and compassion to win independence for India.

    Read More

  • The Power of Nonviolent Resistance (NVR)

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gandhi once said “An eye for an eye and the whole world is blind.” This is true in most circumstances but there are exceptions. By comparing acts of nonviolent civil disobedience with acts of violent civil disobedience it is apparent that force or violence is only necessary to combat violence but never if it effects the lives of the innocent. A recurrent theme in each of these examples is that there is a genuine desire to achieve equality and liberty. However, one cannot take away the liberties of others in order to gain their own. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that political change would come faster through nonviolent methods and one can not argue his results as many of the Jim Crow laws were repealed. Similarly, through nonviolent resistance Gandhi was able to eventually free India from the rule of Britain. It is true that sometimes the only way to fight violence is through violence, but as is apparent, much can be said of peaceful demonstrations in order to enact change. Thus, it is the responsibility of we as individuals to understand that nonviolence is often a more viable means to an end than violence.

    Read More

  • What Does It Mean To Say That Violence Does Not Murder Lie

    1416 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Violence never really deals with the basic evil of the situation. Violence may murder the murderer, but it doesn’t murder murder. Violence may murder the liar, but it doesn’t murder lie; it doesn’t establish truth. Violence may even murder the dishonest man, but it doesn’t murder dishonesty. Violence may go to the point of murdering the hater, but it doesn’t murder hate. It may increase hate. It is always a descending spiral leading nowhere. This is the ultimate weakness of violence: It multiplies evil and violence in the universe. It doesn’t solve any problems.” ― Martin Luther King Jr. (Directly quoted from page 2 of “Quotes About Civil Rights Movement”.) Fourteen year old Emmett Louis Till, was murdered while visiting with relatives in Money, Mississippi. The young boy allegedly flirted with a white sales clerk. Not only was the nation’s reaction, and the bias of the courtroom turbulent factors in the civil rights movement, but the brutality of his murder played a major role as well.

    Read More

  • The Civil Rights Movement: Civil Disobedience vs. Violence

    1080 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the issue of Civil Rights, civil disobedience is a better way to go that aggression. When the African Americans were passive, they were able to achieve more civil rights. People saw that these African Americans were regular people struggling to get rights that they had been deprived of for hundreds of years. Martin Luther King Jr.'s mark on history still is seen today, while Malcolm X was just a spark of anger, blown out by the reciprocation of violent responses.

    Read More

  • gandhi

    591 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gandhi was a well knowledgeable and unique person who found hope in struggles that he never thought would shape who he was. Gandhi was born in a Hindu family, and even though he was the youngest he made a huge impact on others (“Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi” pg 3). He had his older brother who helped him with his education when his father passed away (“Mohandas Gandhi”). Gandhi was very religious even when he was little his brothers tried to make him eat meat (it wasn’t bad to eat meat in Hinduism when you are little), but he refused (“Mohandas Gandhi”). Gandhi respected his religion and was a respectful towards others.

    Read More

  • Nonviolence or Violence: Which Was More Effective?

    1426 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Civil Rights Movement brought many accomplishments to African Americans such as the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968. The key issues that African Americans fought for were voting rights, integration and racial equality. They were tired of the discrimination and humiliation they received as a result of the segregation laws imposed on them. “State laws mandated racial separation in schools, parks, playgrounds, restaurants, hotels, public transportation, theaters, restrooms and so on” (Blumberg 40). Lawsuits had been tried to gain rights such as the unsuccessful Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 and the successful Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. Although, the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka declared the “separate but equal” clause unconstitutional, de facto segregation continued in the South. During the 1960s, two methods were used: nonviolence and violence. Violence proved to be ineffective since it perpetuated social tensions among Whites and Blacks. Nonviolence was the most effective method in bringing social change in America during the 1960s Civil Rights Movement because it attracted sympathy towards Black people, provoked positive media attention, and promoted unity among African Americans.

    Read More

  • A Brief Look at the Thoughts of Frantz Fanon

    1213 Words  | 3 Pages

    The role of violence in the fight against injustice is a tricky one. If an oppressor is willing to use violence to maintain control should not the oppressed use violence to achieve liberation? Franz Fanon would argue that the pent up anger and frustration must be released in violent action to tear down the oppressor’s regime. However, there is a better way and that is through non-violence and understanding that Martin Luther King, Jr. champions. Only through creating tension around injustice via non-violent direct action can the conversation begin around mutual understanding and justice. It is this justice achieved through non-violent means that will last as violent action is ultimately unjust in nature.

    Read More

  • Malcolm X Dbq Analysis

    546 Words  | 2 Pages

    Malcom X was trying to do a good deed, but in the wrong way. He fought for equality and was willing to use violence in order to achieve it. Of course, after being treated unfairly for so long, African Americans had a reason for being angry. However, violence should never be an answer to any problem. There are much better, more effective ways to fight for equality without the need to harm anyone. According to Malcolm X, nonviolence means not being able to defend oneself and (Source E). In actuality, the use of violence only heightens tensions and encouraging African Americans (Source

    Read More

  • Oppression Of People Of Color

    801 Words  | 2 Pages

    Martin Luther King, Jr. advocated nonviolence to suppress oppression in his essay, “The Power of Nonviolent Action.” King's factual and reasoned approach is intended to win his adversaries over by appealing to their consciences. King realized that the best strategy to liberate African-Americans and gain them justice was to use nonviolent forms of resistance. He wanted to eliminate the use of violence as a means to manage and establish cooperative ways of interacting. Moreover, King states that the “oppressed people must organize themselves into a militant and nonviolent mass movement” in order to achieve the goal of integration. The oppressed must “convince the oppressors that all he seeks is justice, for both himself and the white man” (King, 345). Furthermore, King agreed with Gandhi that if a law is unjust, it is the duty of the oppressed to break the law, and do what they believe to be right. Once a law is broken, the person must be willing to accept the ...

    Read More

  • Does Nonviolence Work on a Large Scale?

    1807 Words  | 4 Pages

    It has been debated though out history whether or not nonviolence “works”. Many societies, and this without question includes the United States, have mostly relied on violent tactics. Many people believe that violence is the only way to stop wars, even though it creates war, and people tend to believe that violence is the one solution to many global and political problems. However, recent literature and research is starting to prove otherwise. Erica Chenoweth, a political scientist, recently published a book, Why Civil Resistance Works in 2011. The research highlights data that shows throughout history, nonviolent tactics are more effective than violent ones in various ways.

    Read More

  • Why Do People Break Unjust

    913 Words  | 2 Pages

    For example, the Alabama segregation laws in the 20th century were unjust in every faction possible and it was simply not permissible. Yet, in face of injustice, Martin Luther King and many young protesters refused to abide by the laws and considered it detrimental to obey it. The actions of King and the protestors showed the world that every injustice should be addressed peacefully and with precaution to prevent wide spread consequences in the future. The understanding of facing unjust laws with an unjust act can sometimes be considered to be morally responsible to resist unjust forces. However, Martin Luther King and other scholars have understood the fact that the solution to violence should not be violence, but, instead, it should be a non-violent tactics that will evoke effective ways to tackle the

    Read More

  • Is Non Violence Good

    289 Words  | 1 Pages

    Is violence justified in order to combat oppression or is nonviolence the most effective solution? Not using brutal force is the most effective way to restrain violence. In a “long way gone: memoirs of a boy soldier” Ishmael Beah goes through a lot, as a kid he should have not needed to experience all the violence he went through.

    Read More

  • Common Sense, by Thomas Paine and Letter to Any Would-Be Terrorists, by Naomi Shihab Nye

    1298 Words  | 3 Pages

    Reaching for justice throughout human history has been one of the primordial dreams chased by most humans while at the same time, hunted as a mere fugitive by others in order to satisfy their appalling thirst for injustice. “Injustice anywhere is at threat to justice everywhere” as stated by Martin lather King, if one doesn’t fight for justice he/she might end up having to face the sad reality of injustice taking over everywhere. In order to not let such a thing take place we need to fight against injustice as one. Two literature works which embrace this idea are Common Sense by Thomas Pain and Letter to Any Would-be Terrorists by Naomi Shihab Nye. These two literature works as example of protest literature were very important in illustrating how crucial it was to fight against injustice because both works were effective in encouraging and helping the authors and their audiences share their ideas about a preoccupying topic while hoping at the same time to someday bring about an important social or political change.

    Read More

  • Mahatma Gandhi’s Role in India’s Fight for Independence

    1328 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The strongest physical force bends before moral force when used in the defense of truth.” - Mahatma Gandhi (Bondurant). Mahatma Gandhi was the main leader in helping India become independent through the principles of non violence, self-rule, and the unity of Hindus and Muslims. His full name was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, but he was given the name Mahatma later on in his life. He wanted to see an united India without the rule of the British Empire. He accomplished this with passive resistance or resistance by non violence because he wanted to show that violence is not always the best answer.

    Read More

  • Mahatma Gandhi's Influence and Ideas

    1858 Words  | 4 Pages

    Mahatma Gandhi has had a lasting effect on our world today. His philosophy and ideals have been adopted by many prominent figures in society. A powerful leader, he helped two countries in their struggle for basic rights. Gandhi is an amazing example of the things that can be achieved without violence. He proved that satyagraha is a powerful path to victory. Since his time many leaders have been inspired by his example and anyone who tries to change the world for the better using peaceful means owes something to Gandhi.

    Read More

More about A Comparison Of Violence And Nonviolence

Open Document