A Comparison Of The Civil War And The Tombs By Charles Dickens

1200 Words3 Pages

The two authors saw things differently, but they were both from the United Kingdom, so similarities can be seen. Many aspects of their travels around New York impressed or disappointed them. Two images have been chosen to accompany this text, one for each author, attempting to help convey their most important and impactful themes. Much can be learned about the authors by reading these excerpts, they also contain significant insight into what Americans lived like before the Civil War. First, Charles Dickens’ experience will be explained. Followed by that of Alexander Mackay. Charles Dickens had a lot to say about his trip to New York, and reacted to everything he saw in detail. He was very descriptive of even the smallest details. …show more content…

“The Tombs” was the name of the jailhouse he visited. Every aspect of it that he saw disappointed him, from the doors of the cells to the conditions within. He writes “Let us look in. A small bare cell, into which the light enters through a high chink in the wall (Dickens 201).” The location that left the largest mark on his mind was the Lunatic Asylum. “The building is handsome; and is remarkable for a spacious and elegant staircase (Dickens 221).” The outside of the structure, and even through its entrances, seemed to the eye to be a nice place, which can be seen in “Image 1.” It could be mistaken for a lively state capitol, and lured a visitor to feel safe. The activities that went on inside, left a dark stain in Dicken’s memory. He learned of, and saw a woman, “She was bent, they told me, on committing suicide. If anything could have strengthened her resolution, it would have been the insupportable monotony of such an existence (Dickens 222).” After the visit, he said “…but I never turned my back upon it (America) with feelings of such deep disgust and measureless contempt, as when I crossed the threshold of this mad-house on Long Island (Dickens 223).” His words, which are sometimes a bit over the top, are perfect at conveying the atrocities he witnessed. Such horrible events that largely impacted the way he saw America, overshadowing the good that he saw. The fact that “Image 1” hides a dark …show more content…

He writes about how the city is spread out, and how its streets run. At one point saying of the early parts of New York “The streets were left to develop themselves in the most irregular manner (Mackay 60). He also mentions the newer part of the city and the plans for it development. The buildings of the city had an impact on him, seen in his descriptions of the Trinity Church: “Trinity Church still looks down upon them, but how few of that anxious, quick-moving crowd (of wall street) seem conscious of its solemn rebuke (Mackay 63)!” The magnificence of the city’s infrastructure is not lost on Mackay, who saves a page’s space for the detail of the new croton aqueduct system. The fountain that he mentions can be seen in “Image 2.” This image is used not only to visualize the fountain, but to represent the overall picture of New York that Mackay painted for the reader. It is a picture of a happy, optimistic, and bustling city. Mackay only ever briefly touches on the plights of the underclass, which allows for this nicer image of New York to persist. He rarely refers to a large structure, such as the church or a bank, as a building. Rather, he calls them “piles” of granite, marble, or

Open Document