A Comparison Of Horatio And Laertes In Shakespeare's Hamlet

369 Words1 Page

In the prince’s absence, distraught Ophelia's descent into madness over Polonius's unfortunate death, later causes her to drown while singing love songs. Meanwhile, Prince Hamlet escapes from his planned execution, switches Claudius's letter to the king of England and arranges for the execution of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Laertes, Polonius’s son, joins with the kings and plots on avenging his father and sister. In the last scene of the play Claudius sends for Hamlet asking if he will duel with Laertes for a wager the king has made. Horatio, the prince’s closest and dearest companion , advises against the jester notifying the prince, “You will lose this wager, my lord”(5.2.196). Horatio is aware that the king is attempting to mischief Hamlet, but the prince rejects horatio's notion and attends the duel anyway. Little to prince Hamlet's knowledge, the sword Laertes uses in the fight along with a cup of wine that is poured for the prince has been poisoned. Hamlet’s swordsmanship dominates Laertes's and the Queen mistakenly drinks Hamlet’s tainted cup wine. In the midst of the battle, Hamlet and Laertes are both cut with the poisonous sword. The Queen dies from the poison wine then Laertes, realizing he to will die, confesses and blames Claudius for …show more content…

The rest is silence”(5.2.352-56). Hamlet dies and leaves his kingdom of Denmark to Prince Fortinbras of Norway. Aristotle defines a tragic hero as the main character in a story or piece of writing who has one flaw that brings them to their demise. Prince Hamlet fits this part of a tragic hero with his flaw of procrastination and hesitation. Hamlet's lack of urgency conclusively leads him, Polonius,Ophelia, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, Queen Gertrude, and Laertes to their death.Whereas if the prince would have assassinated the king when first appointed could have been

More about A Comparison Of Horatio And Laertes In Shakespeare's Hamlet

Open Document