3rd Crusades Dbq

1822 Words4 Pages

This investigation attempts to answer the question, “To what extent was the Third Crusade successful?” This question is relevant and important because the Third Crusade is a significant piece of history for both the faiths of Christianity and Islam: the two largest religions in the modern world. The comparison between the purpose and the outcome of the Third Crusade will be addressed. This investigation will focus on the time period of 1189 to 1192 CE, and the places being investigated will include the Middle East, Egypt, and Europe. This investigation will explore the impact of Saladin, King Henry II of England, King Philip II of France, and King Richard I of England. This will be accomplished through a thorough examination of the books God’s …show more content…

Its purpose was to examine the events of the crusades in their own light, as opposed to traps historians often fall into. One being that the people of history are inferior in every way. This view does nothing but assures the observer while unrightfully degrading the past. The other pitfall is to have the idea that everything that happens today is a reflection of a historical event. This book was written to look at history without either of these distracting ideas in mind. A value of this source is the author’s credibility. Christopher Tyerman is the professor of history of the Crusades at University of Oxford. He has published over 25 books about the Crusades. The endnotes are extensive and detailed. A potential limitation of this source is when it was published. It is not extremely out-of-date, but as time passes, more discoveries will be made that are not included in this …show more content…

In order for any military conquest to be successful, the original goal must be achieved. The original goal of the Third Crusade was to regain Jerusalem, or, to be more specific, “The restoration of the Outremer, especially the kingdom of Jerusalem, at least to its pre-Hattin extent.” In order for this to happen, the leaders needed to convince people to fight. Pope Urban (1042-1099) called Christians to a “Holy War”’ against Muslims, causing the First Crusade (1096-1099). Similar strategies were used in the following Crusades to convince people to fight. Bishops and Clerics were sent out to recruit soldiers. Able-bodied males with military experience and sufficient means to pay their own expenses during the crusade were preferred though other people also fought. The soldiers were told that fighting in the Crusade was full reconciliation for their sins, as they were “fighting for God.” Other propaganda included asking people to fight to save their Christian brethren who were suffering under Turkish rule and to put an end to the destruction of Christian shrines. Biblical justification for the violence of the Crusades was found in John 2:15, “Jesus made a whip from some ropes and chased them all out of the Temple. He drove out the sheep and cattle, scattered the money changers’ coins over the floor, and turned over their tables,” and Matthew 10:34, “Don’t imagine that I came to bring peace to

More about 3rd Crusades Dbq

Open Document