1994 Northridge Earthquake

957 Words2 Pages

The 1994 Northridge earthquake was a disaster, as it “involved an entire community” (Edwards, 2013). The earthquake resulted in extensive damage to the infrastructure of the community and localized, long term, multidimensional negative effects to the surrounding communities (Edwards, 2013). While the earthquake had many characteristics of a catastrophe, it did not include “significant damage to the disaster response assets and deaths or injuries to emergency response personnel” (Edwards, 2013). The earthquake required assets from outside the community, such as Caltrans and the FHWA. Also, the damage and disruption was “confined to a sufficiently narrow geographic area” (Edwards, 2013). California, home to many active earthquake faults, has …show more content…

Many different agencies and nonprofits (i.e. FEMA, CDC, USGS, and the Red Cross) offer informational publications and workshops for both individuals and businesses to help them prepare. The California Governor's Office of Emergency Services has emergency preparedness and response resources. The state of California also has a Department of Conservation that provides services and information that promote environmental health, economic vitality, informed land-use decisions, and sound management of the state's natural resources. Specifically, the California Geological Survey (CSG) has an earthquake website which includes various tools such as ShakeMaps (which are a representation of ground shaking produced by an earthquake), probability calculators, shaking hazards, and hazard zones (U.S. Department of Labor, …show more content…

These previous events, while also helping state and local communities plan and prepare for the next earthquake, demonstrated the need for a fast response. As the text notes, inspectors and Caltrans staff were out inspecting freeways the same day the earthquake hit. Within three weeks, reconstruction had begun and repairs to I-10 were completed within three months. All remaining repairs to the highway system were completed by November 4, 1994 (U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002). While the response was quick and public infrastructure was quickly repaired, many heavily damaged neighborhoods “had a slow recovery” (Edwards, 2013). Many homeowners did not have earthquake insurance and/or could not find financing to make repairs. Homes were abandoned and businesses closed. Negative effects lingered for years (Edwards,

Open Document